mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LiveMACE: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agent Capabilities in Evolving Markets

arXiv 2610.09872 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating agents by outcomes alone can obscure the capabilities that produce them. This problem is especially pronounced in evolving environments, where outcomes reflect a closed-loop interaction between agent behavior and changing external conditions. We introduce LiveMACEBench, a process-aware benchmark that uses live financial markets as a naturally evolving testbed for persistent LLM agents. Five frontier LLMs operate along continuous trajectories under matched Tool Use, Persistent Memory, Rule Following, and Multi-Agent Collaboration configurations. We evaluate them through both realized outcomes and mechanism-specific diagnostics derived from complete decision traces. Across 30 days of live evaluation, we find a pronounced outcome-capability gap: realized returns often diverge from capability-specific measurements, and similar outcomes can arise from markedly different patterns of mechanism use. Trace-level diagnostics further expose distinct bottlenecks across capabilities, demonstrating that mechanism access, effective mechanism use, and downstream performance are not interchangeable measures of agent capability. LiveMACEBench makes this distinction measurable, turning live markets from a performance leaderboard into a diagnostic environment for agent capability

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 21 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2026.

Builds on

21 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026CLQT: A Closed-Loop, Cost-Aware, Strategy-Consistent Benchmark for Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Portfolio-Management Agents29 Jun
  2. 2026FinEvolveBench: A Benchmark for Self-Evolving Agents on Low-Repetition Tasks with Implicit Rewards5 Jun
  3. 2026From Knowing to Doing: A Memory-Controlled Benchmark for LLM Trading Agents on Stock Markets27 May
  4. 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework28 Dec
  5. 2024INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent24 Dec
  6. 2023FinMem: A Performance-Enhanced LLM Trading Agent with Layered Memory and Character Design23 Nov

Other references · 15

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  3. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  4. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  5. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  6. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Taskscited by 306
  7. 2023FinanceBench: A New Benchmark for Financial Question Answeringcited by 261
  8. 2023PIXIU: A Large Language Model, Instruction Data and Evaluation Benchmark for Financecited by 217
  9. 2024FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 140
  10. 2024A Multimodal Foundation Agent for Financial Trading: Tool-Augmented, Diversified, and Generalistcited by 137
  11. 2026WildClawBench: A Benchmark for Real-World, Long-Horizon Agent Evaluationcited by 29
  12. 2026Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Dynamic and Asynchronous Environmentscited by 28
3 more
  1. 2025AI-Trader: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents in Real-Time Financial Marketscited by 23
  2. 2026Odysseys: Benchmarking Web Agents on Realistic Long Horizon Taskscited by 19
  3. 2026SWE-Marathon: Can Agents Autonomously Complete Ultra-Long-Horizon Software Work?cited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents
  2. 2026Can Agentic Trading Systems Pay for Their Own Intelligence?
  3. 2026Business Arena: Benchmarking LLM Agents in a Realistic Marketplace
  4. 2026Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Markets
  5. 2026EvolveTrade: Experience-Driven Policy Refinement for Self-Evolving LLM Trading Agents
  6. 2026Beyond Agent Architecture: Execution Assumptions and Reproducibility in LLM-Based Trading Systems
  7. 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows
  8. 2026EcoAgent-Bench: Evaluating Economic Decision-Making in Budget-Constrained LLM Agents