Business Arena: Benchmarking LLM Agents in a Realistic Marketplace
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Running a business is a challenging form of intelligent work. Operators must infer opportunities from partial signals, commit capital under uncertainty, adapt to delayed outcomes in a changing market, and satisfy regulatory obligations before trading legally. Frontier LLM agents can increasingly complete complex workflows, yet business-related capabilities are rarely evaluated in existing agent benchmarks. We introduce Business Arena, a controlled environment where an AI agent runs a cross-border shop, buying from suppliers and selling to buyers over a long horizon. We ground the arena in real Alibaba.com sourcing data and market conditions calibrated from authoritative sources. Delayed and coupled consequences make individual business decisions difficult to judge, but their combined outcome is measurable through profit. Because profit alone cannot explain why an agent succeeds or fails, we compare agents with human-designed strategies to estimate available opportunity, use skill-level metrics to reveal underlying strengths and weaknesses, and trace realized gains and losses to the actions that produced them. We use mechanism ablations to establish that strong results reflect genuine business intelligence rather than neglect or simulator-specific shortcuts. We evaluate 15 frontier models and find a ninefold difference in mean final net worth. Even the best model falls behind human-designed strategies, indicating that business operation remains challenging for LLM agents. Skill-level analysis reveals operating styles, from margin-focused premium sellers to high-turnover wholesalers and customer-service specialists, while action-level attribution identifies the sourcing, pricing, and recovery decisions that create or destroy value. Together, Business Arena takes a first step toward a realistic and trustworthy testbed for evaluating end-to-end business agents.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.
Builds on
9 of 29 references.
References · 9
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2025Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agentscited by 75
- 2025ShoppingBench: A Real-World Intent-Grounded Shopping Benchmark for LLM-based Agentscited by 26
- 2026Crab: A Semantics-Aware Checkpoint/Restore Runtime for Agent Sandboxescited by 11
- 2026textttYC-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Long-Term Planning and Consistent Executioncited by 10
- 2026DeltaBox: Scaling Stateful AI Agents with Millisecond-Level Sandbox Checkpoint/Rollbackcited by 10
- 2026CEO-Bench: Can Agents Play the Long Game?cited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026EnterpriseBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Enterprise-Level Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making
- 2026E-Commerce Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Autonomous Business Operation
- 2026LiveMACE: Process-Aware Evaluation of LLM Agent Capabilities in Evolving Markets
- 2026ERPBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Enterprise Decision-Making Across Competitive Market Ecologies
- 2026BankerToolBench: Evaluating AI Agents in End-to-End Investment Banking Workflows
- 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows
- 2026MiniCorp: The Last Mile of the AI Agent Firm
- 2026Beyond Static Leaderboards: Predictive Validity for the Evaluation of LLM Agents