InfoSFT: Learn More and Forget Less with Information-Aware Token Weighting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) provides the standard approach for teaching LLMs new behaviors from offline expert demonstrations. However, standard SFT uniformly fits all samples -- including those with low likelihood under the base model -- which can disproportionately drive training updates toward overfitting specific samples rather than learning the target behavior. Moreover, adapting to these unlikely samples induces substantial policy shifts that degrade prior capabilities. Existing methods mitigate this by filtering, regenerating, or down-weighting low-likelihood data. In doing so, they often suppress precisely the novel behaviors the base model has yet to learn. We propose InfoSFT, a principled weighting scheme for the SFT objective that concentrates learning signals on maximally informative, medium-confidence tokens -- those neither overly familiar to the base model nor too unlikely to cause instability. Requiring only a one-line modification to the standard token-wise loss, InfoSFT demonstrably improves generalization over vanilla SFT and likelihood-weighted baselines across math, code, and chain-of-thought tasks with diverse model families, while better preserving pre-existing capabilities.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 May 2026.
Builds on
47 of 60 references.
References · 47
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
35 more
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,143
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 860
- 2023Open Problems and Fundamental Limitations of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 743
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 655
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
- 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
- 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 254
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 227
- 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 212
- 2024Preference Fine-Tuning of LLMs Should Leverage Suboptimal, On-Policy Datacited by 184
- 2025RL's Razor: Why Online Reinforcement Learning Forgets Lesscited by 162
- 2022Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learnerscited by 152
- 2023Understanding Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Models via Implicit Inferencecited by 138
- 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
- 2022MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Extensible Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generationcited by 132
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
- 2024Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Self-Synthesized Rehearsalcited by 114
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards: GRPO's Effective Loss, Dynamics, and Success Amplificationcited by 108
- 2020Mirror Descent Policy Optimizationcited by 102
- 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgettingcited by 82
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Naturally Mitigates Forgetting in Continual Post-Trainingcited by 42
- 2024SelectIT: Selective Instruction Tuning for LLMs via Uncertainty-Aware Self-Reflectioncited by 34
- 2025Beyond Log Likelihood: Probability-Based Objectives for Supervised Fine-Tuning across the Model Capability Continuumcited by 16
- 2025Mitigating Forgetting Between Supervised and Reinforcement Learning Yields Stronger Reasonerscited by 14
- 2026Rethinking Generalization in Reasoning SFT: A Conditional Analysis on Optimization, Data, and Model Capabilitycited by 11
- 2026Robust Policy Optimization to Prevent Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 3
- 2026Theoretical Perspectives on Data Quality and Synergistic Effects in Pre- and Post-Training Reasoning Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026iSDFT: Information-Proximal Self-Distillation for Continual Learning in LLMscited by 0
- 2026VisionPsy-Nano: Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Reliability in On-Device Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuningcited by 0
- 2026PG-SFT: Balancing Capability Acquisition and Retention in Offline Agent Fine-Tuning1 Oct 2026
- 2026VisionPsy-Nano: Improving Accuracy, Efficiency, and Reliability in On-Device Vision-Language Models23 Sep 2026
- 2026iSDFT: Information-Proximal Self-Distillation for Continual Learning in LLMs21 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Which Tokens Should SFT Actually Learn? A Token-Trimming Perspective on Mathematical Reasoning
- 2026Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Features
- 2025Blending Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning with Prefix Sampling
- 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuning
- 2026Introspective X Training: Feedback Conditioning Improves Scaling Across all LLM Training Stages
- 2026SoFT: Soft Targets for Generalizable LLM Fine-Tuning
- 2025Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learning
- 2024Understanding Forgetting in LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning and Preference Learning -- A Convex Optimization Perspective