Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance. Accurate attribution on unmodified text, however, does not show whether the prediction still identifies the original source after deliberate rewriting. We formulate this problem as targeted fingerprint transfer: rewriting one model's output so that attribution classifiers assign it to a chosen target model. We study summarization, where different models receive the same document and express the same underlying content, providing a controlled setting for conditional generation. We introduce ForgePrint, a search-then-distil framework that first searches for rewrites that move attribution toward a target fingerprint, then distils the selected rewrites into a one-pass 4B Student model. On CNN/DM, the Student reaches 70.2% target success rate, outperforming both its Teacher (54.1%) and the strongest of six published rewriting baselines (39.3%), against held-out classifiers that are never queried by the attack. It also reaches 68.3% target success when transferring summaries from an open model toward chosen commercial models. These results show that fingerprint detectability should not be conflated with source authenticity, and that text-only attribution can provide misleading evidence of model identity under targeted rewriting, even when it is accurate on unmodified text.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
42 of 52 references.
References · 42
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,049
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 903
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 619
- 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 535
- 2018A Discourse-Aware Attention Model for Abstractive Summarization of Long Documentscited by 478
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
- 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 386
30 more
- 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 288
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 257
- 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 204
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
- 2021TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generationcited by 120
- 2021A Recipe For Arbitrary Text Style Transfer with Large Language Modelscited by 107
- 2020Imitation Attacks and Defenses for Black-box Machine Translation Systemscited by 81
- 2024LLMmap: Fingerprinting For Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2022Prompt-and-Rerank: A Method for Zero-Shot and Few-Shot Arbitrary Textual Style Transfer with Small Language Modelscited by 49
- 2024Model Equality Testing: Which Model Is This API Serving?cited by 47
- 2017A4NT: Author Attribute Anonymity by Adversarial Training of Neural Machine Translationcited by 42
- 2019Reinforcement Learning Based Text Style Transfer without Parallel Training Corpuscited by 38
- 2025Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIscited by 38
- 2025Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2025Revealing Weaknesses in Text Watermarking Through Self-Information Rewrite Attackscited by 18
- 2024TinyStyler: Efficient Few-Shot Text Style Transfer with Authorship Embeddingscited by 17
- 2025AuthorMist: Evading AI Text Detectors with Reinforcement Learningcited by 9
- 2025Enhancing LLM Watermark Resilience Against Both Scrubbing and Spoofing Attackscited by 9
- 2025Fingerprinting LLMs via Prompt Injectioncited by 8
- 2024Discovering Spoofing Attempts on Language Model Watermarkscited by 6
- 2024ALISON: Fast and Effective Stylometric Authorship Obfuscationcited by 5
- 2026TRACE: A Two-Channel Robust Attribution Watermark via Complementary Embeddings for LLM-Agent Trajectoriescited by 5
- 2024DomainSum: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Fine-Grained Domain Shift in Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 4
- 2026Assessing Deanonymization Risks with Stylometry-Assisted LLM Agentcited by 1
- 2026Construction-Driven Injection: Linguistically-Grounded Edit-Based Code-Mixing Fingerprints for Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026ARB: A Matched Authorship-Rewriting Benchmark Dataset for AI-Text Detector Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026The Assistant Erased You: Measuring Loss of Authorship Signals in AI-Mediated Communicationcited by 1
- 2026Targeted Counterfactual Fingerprinting for Black-Box LLM Ownership Verificationcited by 1
- 2026PersonalBench: Measuring the Authorship Gap in LLM Personalizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.