mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TRACE: A Two-Channel Robust Attribution Watermark via Complementary Embeddings for LLM-Agent Trajectories

arXiv 2607.08400 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents reach users through resellers, who may rebrand a developer's agent or substitute a cheaper model. When provenance is disputed, attribution rests on the trajectory log (the record of tool calls, observations, and executed actions, not the model's reasoning), which the reseller stores and processes to meter usage. A watermark must therefore survive an adversary with full read/write access to the very evidence it is detected from; existing agent watermarks do not, as their attribution is read straight off that log. We present TRACE, to our knowledge the first agent watermark that is distortion-free in its action choices, self-synchronizing under deletion, and unconditionally invariant under rewriting. Deletion desynchronizes a position-derived key and rewriting alters content, so a deletion-robust key must come from content and a rewrite-robust key from position, and no single key serves both. A trajectory, however, has room for two watermarks. TRACE superposes a selection channel that sets which action is chosen, keyed on local content with a distortion-free sampler, so the agent's distribution is provably unchanged and detection resynchronizes after deletions, and a tally channel that sets how many records each decision group holds, keyed on the log's skeleton alone, which no rewriting can touch. We prove this behavioral watermark's signal is bought with decision entropy, each decision paying at least half its entropy and deterministic decisions nothing, and that erasing both channels forces the reseller to corrupt the trajectories it resells. On ToolBench and ALFWorld, TRACE matches the unwatermarked agent's success rate while its selection channel reaches detection scores near z = 100 on long-horizon trajectories, stays detectable under 70% step deletion, and keeps a tally channel exactly unchanged under LLM rewriting of any strength.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

Builds on

36 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Watermarking LLM Agent Trajectories21 Feb
  2. 2026On Protecting Agentic Systems' Intellectual Property via Watermarking9 Feb
  3. 2026AgentMark: Utility-Preserving Behavioral Watermarking for Agents5 Jan
  4. 2025Agent Guide: A Simple Agent Behavioral Watermarking Framework8 Apr

Other references · 32

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  4. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  5. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  6. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  7. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  8. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  9. 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 401
  10. 2023Can AI-Generated Text be Reliably Detected?cited by 372
  11. 2023The Stable Signature: Rooting Watermarks in Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 289
  12. 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 279
20 more
  1. 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Textcited by 259
  2. 2023Undetectable Watermarks for Language Modelscited by 208
  3. 2020Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training Datacited by 200
  4. 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Modelscited by 170
  5. 2014A* Samplingcited by 150
  6. 2024Gaussian Shading: Provable Performance-Lossless Image Watermarking for Diffusion Modelscited by 131
  7. 2023Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AIcited by 124
  8. 2023A Survey of Text Watermarking in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 102
  9. 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 100
  10. 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Modelscited by 79
  11. 2024Visibility into AI Agentscited by 77
  12. 2024An Undetectable Watermark for Generative Image Modelscited by 74
  13. 2023Mark My Words: Analyzing and Evaluating Language Model Watermarkscited by 62
  14. 2023Advancing Beyond Identification: Multi-bit Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  15. 2024Black-Box Forgery Attacks on Semantic Watermarks for Diffusion Modelscited by 48
  16. 2024Hidden in the Noise: Two-Stage Robust Watermarking for Imagescited by 18
  17. 2025BiMark: Unbiased Multilayer Watermarking for Large Language Modelscited by 18
  18. 2025SEAL: Semantic Aware Image Watermarkingcited by 13
  19. 2026Breaking Semantic-Aware Watermarks via LLM-Guided Coherence-Preserving Semantic Injectioncited by 7
  20. 2026SLICE: Semantic Latent Injection via Compartmentalized Embedding for Image Watermarkingcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Semantic Behavioral Watermarking: Paraphrase-Robust and Forgery-Resistant Provenance for LLM Agents
  2. 2026TrajMark: Ownership Attribution and Segment-Level Tamper Localization for Coding-Agent Trajectories
  3. 2026Sequential Behavioral Watermarking for LLM Agents
  4. 2026MemMark: State-Evolution Attribution Watermarking for Agent Long-Term Memory Systems
  5. 2024Learning to Watermark LLM-generated Text via Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026WaterMoE: Expert-Routing-based Watermarking for High Fidelity and Efficiency
  7. 2026Rethinking LLM Watermark Detection in Black-Box Settings: A Non-Intrusive Third-Party Framework
  8. 2026Improving the Trade-off Between Watermark Strength and Speculative Sampling Efficiency for Language Models