mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HunterAgent: Neuro-Symbolic Attack Trace Reconstruction under Anti-Forensics

arXiv 2605.29269 ↗First posted 28 May 2026cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern alert-triage systems reduce SOC burden by filtering false positives, but flagging a high-risk alert is only the start of incident response. Threat hunting requires reconstructing causal attack chains across heterogeneous, partially corrupted logs. Against APTs using anti-forensics (parent-PID spoofing, log wiping, fileless execution), provenance graphs split into disjoint subgraphs and fail. Unconstrained LLM agents fabricate causal links violating OS physics, producing fluent but forensically inadmissible narratives. We propose HunterAgent, a neuro-symbolic framework that reframes trace reconstruction as cost-bounded heuristic graph search under partial observability. It uses an asymmetric Generator-Verifier pipeline: the LLM proposes semantic hypotheses within a typed ontology, while a verifier grounds each via identifier-level collisions on surviving orthogonal telemetry. To resolve severed traces, we score hops using a calibrated cost combining semantic divergence and OS temporal potential; schema violations are hard-pruned. A length-discounted epistemic budget prevents inferential drift and forces graceful halting. Under strict LOFO cross-validation on three public benchmarks and an in-house 40-trace dataset, HunterAgent achieves 86.1% mean F1, outperforming the top agentic baseline by 26.7 F1 and KAIROS by 17.1 F1, while cutting path-level hallucination from 61.5% to 6.4%. Under 70% log wiping, recall drops but precision stays >=84%, with 95.7% halting safely. All results hold under the realistic assumption that at least one orthogonal telemetry source survives.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 May 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Automating Attack Graph Construction for Agentic Pentesting. Towards Neuro-Symbolic Vulnerability Hunting
  2. 2026DiagChain: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Evidence-Grounded Attack Chain Reconstruction
  3. 2026Minos: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Provenance-Based Backward Tracking
  4. 2026Cross-Layer Semantic Flow Reconstruction for Attack Detection in Agentic Systems
  5. 2025LLM-driven Provenance Forensics for Threat Investigation and Detection
  6. 2026Forensic Trajectory Signatures for Agent Memory Poisoning Detection
  7. 2026Retroactive Chain-of-Thought (RetroCoT): Forensic Reconstruction Prompts as a Safety Diagnostic Across Model Generations
  8. 2026PropGuard: Safeguarding LLM-MAS via Propagation-Aware Exploration and Remediation