When Does Unsupervised Learning Succeed or Fail? A PoS Perspective on Reconstruction-Based Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reconstruction-based unsupervised learning can fail in two opposing ways: a model may reconstruct anomalies too accurately or discard valid nominal variation. Using the Pursuit of Subspaces hypothesis, we characterize these failures through the meet, union, and join geometries induced by the nominal components. Excess learned range produces join blindness, while insufficient capacity produces meet preference and loss of nominal fidelity. We show that the compact nominal union is optimal among nominal faithful ranges and generally requires a nonlinear reconstruction map. Based on this geometry, we introduce Dynamic Push and Pull, which learns from controlled perturbations without anomaly labels, and nested manifold carving, which applies the same principle recursively in latent space. Experiments confirm the predicted changes in latent geometry across every tested Push and Pull configuration. The proposed methods improve reconstruction-based anomaly detection across standard benchmarks and unseen image degradations, while also improving pretrained ECG representations for downstream classification. These results connect reconstruction failures to identifiable geometric conditions and provide practical mechanisms for learning compact representations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.
Builds on
38 of 73 references.
References · 38
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2017Enhanced Deep Residual Networks for Single Image Super-Resolutioncited by 1,543
- 2016Deep Multi-scale Convolutional Neural Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurringcited by 722
- 2017Unsupervised Anomaly Detection with Generative Adversarial Networks to Guide Marker Discoverycited by 566
- 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 560
- 2021CutPaste: Self-Supervised Learning for Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 529
- 2021DRAEM -- A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detectioncited by 510
- 2020CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally Shifted Instancescited by 441
- 2018GANomaly: Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection via Adversarial Trainingcited by 409
- 2016Deep Joint Rain Detection and Removal from a Single Imagecited by 351
- 2018Deep Anomaly Detection Using Geometric Transformationscited by 269
26 more
- 2018Density-aware Single Image De-raining using a Multi-stream Dense Networkcited by 248
- 2020Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Datacited by 210
- 2019OCGAN: One-class Novelty Detection Using GANs with Constrained Latent Representationscited by 199
- 2017Image De-raining Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 197
- 2021Natural Synthetic Anomalies for Self-Supervised Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 116
- 2018Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detectioncited by 115
- 2020Old is Gold: Redefining the Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier Training Paradigmcited by 115
- 2016Deep Structured Energy Based Models for Anomaly Detectioncited by 113
- 2021U-shape Transformer for Underwater Image Enhancementcited by 110
- 2024ECG-FM: An Open Electrocardiogram Foundation Modelcited by 89
- 2024Guiding Masked Representation Learning to Capture Spatio-Temporal Relationship of Electrocardiogramcited by 84
- 2024Zero-Shot ECG Classification with Multimodal Learning and Test-time Clinical Knowledge Enhancementcited by 66
- 2022Self-Supervised Masking for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Localizationcited by 43
- 2021Learning Not to Reconstruct Anomaliescited by 31
- 2020ARAE: Adversarially Robust Training of Autoencoders Improves Novelty Detectioncited by 27
- 2020Memory Augmented Generative Adversarial Networks for Anomaly Detectioncited by 12
- 2023Masked Autoencoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Imagescited by 9
- 2025Autoencoders for Anomaly Detection are Unreliablecited by 9
- 2020Regularized Cycle Consistent Generative Adversarial Network for Anomaly Detectioncited by 6
- 2025Benchmarking ECG FMs: A Reality Check Across Clinical Taskscited by 6
- 2024Exploiting Autoencoder's Weakness to Generate Pseudo Anomaliescited by 4
- 2023Targeted collapse regularized autoencoder for anomaly detection: black hole at the centercited by 1
- 2025Expert Operational GANS: Towards Real-Color Underwater Image Restorationcited by 1
- 2026Toward Faithful Explanations in Acoustic Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2026SPG: Sparse-Projected Guides with Sparse Autoencoders for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Axiomatizing Neural Networks via Pursuit of Subspacescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.