SPG: Sparse-Projected Guides with Sparse Autoencoders for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation
Abstract (arXiv)
We study zero-shot anomaly detection and segmentation using frozen foundation model features, where all learnable parameters are trained only on a labeled auxiliary dataset and deployed to unseen target categories without any target-domain adaptation. Existing prompt-based approaches use handcrafted or learned prompt embeddings as reference vectors for normal/anomalous states. We propose Sparse-Projected Guides (SPG), a prompt-free framework that learns sparse guide coefficients in the Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) latent space, which generate normal/anomaly guide vectors via the SAE dictionary. SPG employs a two stage learning strategy on the labeled auxiliary dataset: (i) train an SAE on patch-token features, and (ii) optimize only guide coefficients using auxiliary pixel-level masks while freezing the backbone and SAE. On MVTec AD and VisA under cross-dataset zero-shot settings, SPG achieves competitive image-level detection and strong pixel-level segmentation; with DINOv3, SPG attains the highest pixellevel AUROC among the compared methods. We also report SPG instantiated with OpenCLIP (ViT-L/14@336px) to align the backbone with CLIP-based baselines. Moreover, the learned guide coefficients trace decisions back to a small set of dictionary atoms, revealing category-general and category-specific factors.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Sparse autoencoder training and evaluation, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2026.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2023Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Trainingcited by 3,109
- 2021Towards Total Recall in Industrial Anomaly Detectioncited by 776
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2022SPot-the-Difference Self-Supervised Pre-training for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 400
- 2023WinCLIP: Zero-/Few-Shot Anomaly Classification and Segmentationcited by 315
- 2023AnomalyCLIP: Object-agnostic Prompt Learning for Zero-shot Anomaly Detectioncited by 271
- 2013k-Sparse Autoencoderscited by 215
- 2025AA-CLIP: Enhancing Zero-shot Anomaly Detection via Anomaly-Aware CLIPcited by 73
- 2024AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2cited by 53
- 2024VCP-CLIP: A visual context prompting model for zero-shot anomaly segmentationcited by 50
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Augmenting Visual Anomaly Detection with Automated Interpretability
- 2025PromptMoE: Generalizable Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection via Visually-Guided Prompt Mixtures
- 2026AnomalyVFM -- Transforming Vision Foundation Models into Zero-Shot Anomaly Detectors
- 2026MRAD: Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection with Memory-Driven Retrieval
- 2026MoECLIP: Patch-Specialized Experts for Zero-shot Anomaly Detection
- 2025ACD-CLIP: Decoupling Representation and Dynamic Fusion for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection
- 2026Keep the Needle, Prune the Haystack: Defect-Preserving Token Pruning for Efficient Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection
- 2025CoPS: Conditional Prompt Synthesis for Zero-Shot Anomaly Detection