mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MSI-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Speaker Voice Interaction for Collaborative AI Agents

arXiv 2609.24812 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Voice provides a natural and immediate interface for AI agents. Many settings in which voice agents could be useful, including meetings, households, and collaborative work, are inherently multi-speaker. Supporting these settings introduces challenges that are largely absent from one-on-one interaction. We introduce the Multi-Speaker Interaction Benchmark (MSI-Bench) for evaluating multi-speaker voice interaction. Each test case is a short multi-party multi-turn audio scene with participant context, expected tool calls, and atomic rubrics. The benchmark targets three capability families: multi-speaker memory, multi-speaker instruction following, and multi-speaker reasoning. It comprises 1,152 test cases, evenly split between Mandarin Chinese and English (576 each). The strongest configuration on each split passes all rubrics on only 66.8% of English and 54.5% of Mandarin cases, and the strongest open-weight configuration on 34.0% and 19.3%. Failure analysis separates perception from reasoning: open-weight models are bottlenecked by the multi-speaker audio front-end, while frontier systems still fail speaker-scoped decision making on clean transcripts---and models across the board often respond when no one has addressed them. These results identify speaker-grounded perception, speaker-scoped decision making, and conversational restraint as concrete targets for future voice agents.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 35 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,384
  2. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
  3. 2025Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAscited by 521
  4. 2025Full-Duplex-Bench: A Benchmark to Evaluate Full-duplex Spoken Dialogue Models on Turn-taking Capabilitiescited by 100
  5. 2025MiMo-Audio: Audio Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 65
  6. 2025Full-Duplex-Bench v1.5: Evaluating Overlap Handling for Full-Duplex Speech Modelscited by 54
  7. 2025Full-Duplex-Bench-v2: A Multi-Turn Evaluation Framework for Duplex Dialogue Systems with an Automated Examinercited by 41
  8. 2026Full-Duplex-Bench-v3: Benchmarking Tool Use for Full-Duplex Voice Agents Under Real-World Disfluencycited by 37
  9. 2026τ-Voice: Benchmarking Full-Duplex Voice Agents on Real-World Domainscited by 36
  10. 2025MTR-DuplexBench: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Multi-Round Conversations for Full-Duplex Speech Language Modelscited by 22
  11. 2025Audio MultiChallenge: A Multi-Turn Evaluation of Spoken Dialogue Systems on Natural Human Interactioncited by 19
  12. 2026SocialOmni: Benchmarking Audio-Visual Social Interactivity in Omni Modelscited by 13
7 more
  1. 2026Full-Duplex Interaction in Spoken Dialogue Systems: A Comprehensive Study from the ICASSP 2026 HumDial Challengecited by 13
  2. 2025MSU-Bench: Towards Understanding the Conversational Multi-talker Scenarioscited by 10
  3. 2026Instruct-FD: Can Your Full-Duplex Speech System Follow Turn-Taking Instructions?cited by 6
  4. 2026Speak or Stay Silent: Context-Aware Turn-Taking in Multi-Party Dialoguecited by 5
  5. 2026IHBench: Evaluating Post-Interruption Recovery in Voice Agents with Structured Workflowscited by 5
  6. 2026Still Between Us? Evaluating and Improving Voice Assistant Robustness to Third-Party Interruptionscited by 3
  7. 2026Omni-DuplexEval: Evaluating Real-time Duplex Omni-modal Interactioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.