MSU-Bench: Towards Understanding the Conversational Multi-talker Scenarios
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spoken Language Understanding (SLU) has progressed from traditional single-task methods to large audio language model (LALM) solutions. Yet, most existing speech benchmarks focus on single-speaker or isolated tasks, overlooking the challenges posed by multi-speaker conversations that are common in real-world scenarios. We introduce MSU-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating multi-speaker conversational understanding with a speaker-centric design. Our hierarchical framework covers four progressive tiers: single-speaker static attribute understanding, single-speaker dynamic attribute understanding, multi-speaker background understanding, and multi-speaker interaction understanding. This structure ensures all tasks are grounded in speaker-centric contexts, from basic perception to complex reasoning across multiple speakers. By evaluating state-of-the-art models on MSU-Bench, we demonstrate that as task complexity increases across the benchmark's tiers, all models exhibit a significant performance decline. We also observe a persistent capability gap between open-source models and closed-source commercial ones, particularly in multi-speaker interaction reasoning. These findings validate the effectiveness of MSU-Bench for assessing and advancing conversational understanding in realistic multi-speaker environments. Demos can be found in the supplementary material.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 7.
10 papers.
- 2025EchoMind: An Interrelated Multi-level Benchmark for Evaluating Empathetic Speech Language Modelscited by 11
- 2026VoxPrivacy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Interactional Privacy of Speech Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025M3-SLU: Evaluating Speaker-Attributed Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026MSI-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Speaker Voice Interaction for Collaborative AI Agentscited by 4
- 2025Protecting Bystander Privacy via Selective Hearing in Audio LLMscited by 2
- 2026Cocktail-Talker: Multi-Speaker Dialog Modeling in Noisy Social Environments with Turn Action GRPOcited by 2
- 2026MP-Bench: Evaluating Voice Agents as a Multiparty Conversation Participantcited by 2
- 2026HEAR Who Said What: Unlocking Speaker-Attributed Reasoning via Counterfactual Voice Groundingcited by 0
- 2026The Eloquence submission for Task 2 of the Interspeech 2026 MLC-SLM challengecited by 0
- 2026Beyond Dyadic Memory: Interaction-Aware Multimodal Memory with Adaptive Agentic Retrieval for Multi-Party Spoken Conversationscited by 0
- 2026Beyond Dyadic Memory: Interaction-Aware Multimodal Memory with Adaptive Agentic Retrieval for Multi-Party Spoken Conversations26 Sep 2026
- 2026MSI-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Speaker Voice Interaction for Collaborative AI Agents21 Sep 2026
- 2026MP-Bench: Evaluating Voice Agents as a Multiparty Conversation Participant11 Sep 2026
- 2026The Eloquence submission for Task 2 of the Interspeech 2026 MLC-SLM challenge10 Sep 2026
- 2026HEAR Who Said What: Unlocking Speaker-Attributed Reasoning via Counterfactual Voice Grounding29 Aug 2026
- 2026Cocktail-Talker: Multi-Speaker Dialog Modeling in Noisy Social Environments with Turn Action GRPO30 Jul 2026
- 2026VoxPrivacy: A Benchmark for Evaluating Interactional Privacy of Speech Language Models27 Jan 2026
- 2025Protecting Bystander Privacy via Selective Hearing in Audio LLMs6 Dec 2025
- 2025EchoMind: An Interrelated Multi-level Benchmark for Evaluating Empathetic Speech Language Models26 Oct 2025
- 2025M3-SLU: Evaluating Speaker-Attributed Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models22 Oct 2025