Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 113 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2026.
Builds on
57 of 113 references.
References · 57
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,585
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,214
- 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,027
- 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 597
- 2018On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agentscited by 547
- 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 536
38 more
- 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 441
- 2022PlanBench: An Extensible Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models on Planning and Reasoning about Changecited by 382
- 2022Visual Language Maps for Robot Navigationcited by 365
- 2019DD-PPO: Learning Near-Perfect PointGoal Navigators from 2.5 Billion Framescited by 362
- 2021ScanQA: 3D Question Answering for Spatial Scene Understandingcited by 346
- 2017Embodied Question Answeringcited by 336
- 2019REVERIE: Remote Embodied Visual Referring Expression in Real Indoor Environmentscited by 333
- 2023Android in the Wild: A Large-Scale Dataset for Android Device Controlcited by 319
- 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 235
- 2022CoWs on Pasture: Baselines and Benchmarks for Language-Driven Zero-Shot Object Navigationcited by 194
- 2022ZSON: Zero-Shot Object-Goal Navigation using Multimodal Goal Embeddingscited by 178
- 2024SciCode: A Research Coding Benchmark Curated by Scientistscited by 178
- 2025An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agentscited by 174
- 2025AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challengescited by 169
- 2024AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?cited by 158
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 152
- 2017Neural Episodic Controlcited by 151
- 2022PONI: Potential Functions for ObjectGoal Navigation with Interaction-free Learningcited by 150
- 2023Progressive-Hint Prompting Improves Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 147
- 2024BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Gamescited by 146
- 2024CORE-Bench: Fostering the Credibility of Published Research Through a Computational Reproducibility Agent Benchmarkcited by 123
- 2018Episodic Curiosity through Reachabilitycited by 109
- 2025Agentic Large Language Models, a surveycited by 108
- 2025DeepSeekMath-V2: Towards Self-Verifiable Mathematical Reasoningcited by 94
- 2025Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluationcited by 92
- 2017A multi-agent reinforcement learning model of common-pool resource appropriationcited by 69
- 2026Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliabilitycited by 65
- 2022CLIP-Nav: Using CLIP for Zero-Shot Vision-and-Language Navigationcited by 55
- 2025Levels of Autonomy for AI Agentscited by 48
- 2025Efficient Agents: Building Effective Agents While Reducing Costcited by 32
- 2025Beyond the Destination: A Novel Benchmark for Exploration-Aware Embodied Question Answeringcited by 30
- 2026Agent Drift: Quantifying Behavioral Degradation in Multi-Agent LLM Systems Over Extended Interactionscited by 28
- 2024MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domainscited by 19
- 2025Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 13
- 2014An Overview of Hierarchical Task Network Planningcited by 12
- 2025Aegis: Taxonomy and Optimizations for Overcoming Agent-Environment Failures in LLM Agentscited by 10
- 2024Cooperative Resilience in Artificial Intelligence Multiagent Systemscited by 8
- 2024Towards Deviation-Robust Agent Navigation via Perturbation-Aware Contrastive Learningcited by 6
50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.