mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2609.06880 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2026cs.CV cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning over language instructions in embodied tasks such as robotics often requires understanding spatial relations from a speaker's situated perspective. Humans infer such perspectives from shared environmental knowledge, activity context, and commonsense. Recent vision-language models (VLMs) appear capable of spatial reasoning, but their ability to infer a speaker's viewpoint from contextual cues and interpret situated spatial relations from that viewpoint remains unclear. We call this capability contextual observer grounding. To study this capability, we construct the Point-of-View Benchmark (POVBench), a dataset of 3D scenes and queries that disentangles Inferred, Stated, and Given forms of observer grounding in natural embodied communication. Given multi-view observations and a natural-language sentence, models must localize unseen or underspecified targets from situated spatial and contextual cues. Across state-of-the-art VLMs, localizing targets from directional language remains challenging, even when observer grounding is made explicit. We find that explicit breakdowns of observer-relative spatial reasoning improve target localization. Our project page is available at https://mimo-owl.github.io/POVBench/.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025REM: Evaluating LLM Embodied Spatial Reasoning through Multi-Frame Trajectories30 Nov
  2. 2025ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models27 May

Other references · 9

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
  4. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
  5. 2025OpenAI GPT-5 System Cardcited by 989
  6. 2026Gemma 4 Technical Reportcited by 259
  7. 2024RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Roboticscited by 251
  8. 2025Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical Worldcited by 83
  9. 2026MolmoPoint: Better Pointing for VLMs with Grounding Tokenscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning?
  2. 2026ERGeoBench:A Comprehensive Benchmark for Embodied Reasoning and Geo-localization in Multimodal Large Language Models
  3. 2026SpaceCast-Bench: Evaluating Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026ESPIRE: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Embodied Spatial Reasoning of Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Point-It-Out: Benchmarking Embodied Reasoning for Vision Language Models in Multi-Stage Visual Grounding
  6. 2026SpatialPoint: Spatial-aware Point Prediction for Embodied Localization
  7. 2026When More Is Less: A Systematic Analysis of Spatial and Commonsense Information for Visual Spatial Reasoning
  8. 2024Do Vision-Language Models Represent Space and How? Evaluating Spatial Frame of Reference Under Ambiguities