REM: Evaluating LLM Embodied Spatial Reasoning through Multi-Frame Trajectories
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Humans build viewpoint-independent cognitive maps through navigation, enabling intuitive reasoning about object permanence and spatial relations. We argue that multimodal large language models (MLLMs), despite extensive video training, lack this fundamental spatial reasoning capability, a critical limitation for embodied applications. To demonstrate these limitations and drive research, we introduce REM (Reasoning over Embodied Multi-Frame Trajectories), a benchmark using controllable 3D environments for long-horizon embodied spatial reasoning. REM systematically evaluates key aspects like object permanence/distinction, spatial relationships, and numerical tracking across dynamic embodied viewpoints. Our evaluation shows that the best-performing current models exhibit promising overall performance, but become increasingly unreliable at even moderate complexity levels easily handled by humans. These findings highlight challenges MLLMs face in developing robust spatial representations from sequential visual input. Consequently, REM provides targeted metrics and diagnostics to foster improved spatial understanding in future models.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2025.
Builds on
29 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
16 more
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,624
- 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,375
- 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,086
- 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 666
- 2019CLEVRER: CoLlision Events for Video REpresentation and Reasoningcited by 475
- 2018TVQA: Localized, Compositional Video Question Answeringcited by 463
- 2018A Corpus for Reasoning About Natural Language Grounded in Photographscited by 457
- 2017TGIF-QA: Toward Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Visual Question Answeringcited by 378
- 2024TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?cited by 352
- 2024World Model on Million-Length Video And Language With Blockwise RingAttentioncited by 196
- 2024MMBench-Video: A Long-Form Multi-Shot Benchmark for Holistic Video Understandingcited by 180
- 2019CATER: A diagnostic dataset for Compositional Actions and TEmporal Reasoningcited by 137
- 2023Video-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Video-based Large Language Modelscited by 107
- 2021VALUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Video-and-Language Understanding Evaluationcited by 95
- 2019GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answeringcited by 77
- 2023VITATECS: A Diagnostic Dataset for Temporal Concept Understanding of Video-Language Modelscited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026SpaMEM: Benchmarking Dynamic Spatial Reasoning via Perception-Memory Integration in Embodied Environmentscited by 6
- 2026Can Vision-Language Models Solve the Shell Game?cited by 2
- 2026EventPrune: Cascaded Event-Assisted Token Pruning for Efficient First-Person Dynamic Spatial Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Contextual Observer Grounding: Evaluating Situated Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models7 Sep 2026
- 2026EventPrune: Cascaded Event-Assisted Token Pruning for Efficient First-Person Dynamic Spatial Reasoning19 May 2026
- 2026SpaMEM: Benchmarking Dynamic Spatial Reasoning via Perception-Memory Integration in Embodied Environments24 Apr 2026
- 2026Can Vision-Language Models Solve the Shell Game?9 Mar 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Multimodal Spatial Reasoning in the Large Model Era: A Survey and Benchmarks
- 2025Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey of Tasks, Benchmarks and Methods
- 2025EmbodiedVSR: Dynamic Scene Graph-Guided Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Visual Spatial Tasks
- 2025Embodied Spatial Intelligence: from Implicit Scene Modeling to Spatial Reasoning
- 2026InsightMap: Structured Spatial Modeling for Embodied Multimodal Reasoning
- 2025UrbanVideo-Bench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models on Embodied Intelligence with Video Data in Urban Spaces
- 2024EmbSpatial-Bench: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding for Embodied Tasks with Large Vision-Language Models
- 2026ESPIRE: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Embodied Spatial Reasoning of Vision-Language Models