mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RL-ADA: A World-Feedback Framework for Adversarially Robust Enterprise Dialogue Agents

arXiv 2609.02902 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying task-oriented dialogue agents in enterprise customer support faces a persistent annotation bottleneck: robust training requires labelled interaction data at scale, yet enterprise conversational logs are privacy-sensitive and expensive to annotate, while user behaviour evolves faster than labelling pipelines can keep pace. We present RL-ADA (Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Dialogue Agents), a co-evolutionary training framework that eliminates this bottleneck by replacing human labels with world feedback: consequence-based reward signals derived directly from measurable interaction outcomes. A Customer Support Agent (DA, 3B parameters) and an Adversarial Customer Agent (CA, 7B parameters) co-evolve in an adversarial arena guided by a fixed automated judge: the DA is rewarded for correctly handling multi-turn customer conversations to successful resolution, while the CA is rewarded for producing realistic, intent-concealing utterances that cause misroutes, creating asymmetric adversarial pressure through opposing but independently structured rewards. An isolation gym iteratively retrains the weaker agent on prior-failure transcripts, requiring no human annotation at any stage. In a banking customer support proof of concept, tool-routing errors are eliminated and the strict end-to-end PASS rate doubles over five co-evolutionary cycles, driven solely by automated arena reward with no labelled data. We additionally observe the emergence of Contextual Camouflage, an adversarial strategy in which the CA learns to embed intent within dense realistic customer detail purely from reward pressure, with direct implications for enterprise red-teaming and robustness evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

11 of 18 references.

References · 11

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  4. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
  5. 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,103
  6. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  7. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  8. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 433
  9. 2017Cycles in adversarial regularized learningcited by 124
  10. 2018The Mechanics of n-Player Differentiable Gamescited by 118
  11. 2025Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Agent Safetycited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements
  2. 2026ToolRACER: A Robust Agentic Conversation Emulation Resource for Agent Training and Evaluation
  3. 2025SpeakRL: Synergizing Reasoning, Speaking, and Acting in Language Models with Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026Verifiable Self-Evolution for Open-Ended Dialogue Skills via Future-Feedback Prediction
  5. 2024Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations
  6. 2021Integrating Pretrained Language Model for Dialogue Policy Learning
  7. 2025MindFlow+: A Self-Evolving Agent for E-Commerce Customer Service
  8. 2020Human-centric Dialog Training via Offline Reinforcement Learning