mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ToolMinimize: Auditing and Rewriting LLM Agent Tool Calls to Minimize Privacy Exposure

arXiv 2608.24957 ↗First posted 25 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents routinely include privacy-sensitive data (PSD) in tool call arguments beyond what the invoked tools require, crossing trust boundaries to third-party services on every invocation. A controlled measurement on three production LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3.3-70B) shows that 81--88% of tool calls include unnecessary PSD under default prompts; explicit privacy instructions still leave 36--76% over-sharing. Existing defenses gate calls (allow/block) or label flows (information-flow control) but cannot rewrite argument values, and PII detection tools miss implicit PSD like ``Memorial Sloan Kettering'' (a hospital name that implies a diagnosis). We present system, a middleware that intercepts tool calls and rewrites their arguments to the minimum data necessary for tool functionality, combining schema-aware necessity analysis with four operations: removal, generalization, substitution, and truncation. Live validation on 307 tool calls across the three LLMs above reduces privacy cost by 81.2--92.0% at 100% argument-level task validity (TOST equivalence p<0.001 at Delta=1.0); on 25 unannotated Model Context Protocol (MCP) schemas, by 79.0% with no textttminimumnecessary metadata. An optional LLM content-necessity layer strips task-irrelevant PSD from otherwise-necessary free-text fields, raising live-LLM reduction to 85.1--95.6% and author-schema reduction from 71.1% to 90.9%. Median latency is 1.77,ms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2026.

Builds on

26 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 13

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025AudAgent: Automated Auditing of Privacy Policy Compliance in AI Agents3 Nov
  2. 2025Exposing LLM User Privacy via Traffic Fingerprint Analysis: A Study of Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Interactions8 Oct
  3. 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents22 Sep
  4. 2025The Sum Leaks More Than Its Parts: Compositional Privacy Risks and Mitigations in Multi-Agent Collaboration16 Sep
  5. 2025GAMA: A General Anonymizing Multi-Agent System for Privacy Preservation Enhanced by Domain Rules and Disproof Mechanism12 Sep
  6. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents11 Jun
  7. 2025IP Leakage Attacks Targeting LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems18 May
  8. 2025MCP Safety Audit: LLMs with the Model Context Protocol Allow Major Security Exploits2 Apr
  9. 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Design24 Mar
  10. 2025Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memory17 Feb
  11. 2025RTBAS: Defending LLM Agents Against Prompt Injection and Privacy Leakage13 Feb
  12. 2024Privacy Leakage Overshadowed by Views of AI: A Study on Human Oversight of Privacy in Language Model Agent2 Nov
1 more
  1. 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies28 Jul

Other references · 13

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
  2. 2025Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directionscited by 265
  3. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  4. 2024Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 223
  5. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
  6. 2025Securing AI Agents with Information-Flow Controlcited by 121
  7. 2025Open Challenges in Multi-Agent Security: Towards Secure Systems of Interacting AI Agentscited by 71
  8. 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 57
  9. 2024Privacy-Preserving Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Differential Privacycited by 39
  10. 2025PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliancecited by 37
  11. 2025Privacy Auditing of Large Language Modelscited by 23
  12. 2025Securing the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Risks, Controls, and Governancecited by 23
1 more
  1. 2024RAG with Differential Privacycited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ToolPrivacyBench: Benchmarking Purpose-Bound Privacy in Tool-Using LLM Agents
  2. 2026The Claws in Plain Sight: Unauthorized Context Disclosure through LLM Agent Tool Calls
  3. 2025MiniScope: A Least Privilege Framework for Authorizing Tool Calling Agents
  4. 2026AgentRaft: Automated Detection of Data Over-Exposure in LLM Agents
  5. 2026ASLEval: Measuring Privacy Exposure Displacement in LLM Agent Sessions
  6. 2026AgentCIScope: Grounded Contextual Integrity Evaluation for LLM Agents
  7. 2026PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say
  8. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems