mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Claws in Plain Sight: Unauthorized Context Disclosure through LLM Agent Tool Calls

arXiv 2608.20658 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2026cs.CR cs.ETcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents routinely construct tool-call arguments from user profiles, conversation history, retrieved documents, and prior tool results. However, legitimate access to contextual information does not imply authorization to transmit that information for every purpose or destination. We present Claw in Plain Sight, an authority- pressure attack in which task-adjacent content frames protected attributes as operationally or procedurally required, causing a model to include them in otherwise valid generated arguments. We evaluate Claw in Plain Sight using a controlled synthetic benchmark that crosses six pressure levels with four privacy-policy levels across five DeepSeek and Claude model configurations, producing 120 calls. Across the complete pressure-policy matrix, session-level disclosure rates range from 20.8% to 75.0% among the tested models. Stronger privacy instructions reduce aggregate disclosure but do not eliminate it consistently across models, showing that prompt-level policies do not provide a portable enforcement boundary. Our experiments use only synthetic profiles and capture proposed arguments locally; they measure policy-violating generation at the context-to-argument boundary, not completed network exfiltration or leakage from deployed users. These findings motivate purpose- and destination-aware inspection of generated tool arguments before execution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2026.

Builds on

11 of 16 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Clawdrain: Exploiting Tool-Calling Chains for Stealthy Token Exhaustion in OpenClaw Agents1 Mar
  2. 2025Parasites in the Toolchain: A Large-Scale Analysis of Attacks on the MCP Ecosystem8 Sep
  3. 2025Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents28 Apr
  4. 2025Adaptive Attacks Break Defenses Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on LLM Agents27 Feb
  5. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May
  6. 2024InjecAgent: Benchmarking Indirect Prompt Injections in Tool-Integrated Large Language Model Agents5 Mar

Other references · 5

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  3. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 364
  4. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  5. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ClawGuard: A Runtime Security Framework for Tool-Augmented LLM Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection
  2. 2026AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents
  3. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents
  4. 2026AgentCIScope: Grounded Contextual Integrity Evaluation for LLM Agents
  5. 2026OverAct: Measuring and Mitigating Proactive Over-Authorization in LLM Tool-Calling Agents
  6. 2026ASLEval: Measuring Privacy Exposure Displacement in LLM Agent Sessions
  7. 2025Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents
  8. 2025Exposing LLM User Privacy via Traffic Fingerprint Analysis: A Study of Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Interactions