mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MiniScope: A Least Privilege Framework for Authorizing Tool Calling Agents

arXiv 2512.11147 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

AI agents are increasingly granted autonomous access to sensitive user data and third-party services, making effective permission management a critical security challenge. Existing permission models, however, typically rely on flat permission structures that fail to balance security with usability: fine-grained confirmation induces user fatigue, while coarse-grained or persistent approval leads to overprivileged agents. To address this tradeoff, we propose a task-centric, hierarchical permission model that treats an agent as a delegate operating within a task-specific role instead of requiring a separate permission decision for every tool call. Building on this model, we present MiniScope, an end-to-end permission system for agents that automates permission-hierarchy discovery and enforces contextual least privilege at runtime. Our evaluation shows that MiniScope reduces simulated permission confirmations by 43.4%-89.4% for cautious and typical personas relative to per-tool prompting and mitigates all privilege-escalation attacks with negligible impact on utility and runtime. Applied to real-world deployments, MiniScope further uncovers six overprivileged connector configurations in ChatGPT and Claude.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 56 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2025.

Builds on

56 of 108 references.

Closest ancestors · 18

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Breaking and Fixing Defenses Against Control-Flow Hijacking in Multi-Agent Systems20 Oct
  2. 2025OS-Harm: A Benchmark for Measuring Safety of Computer Use Agents17 Jun
  3. 2025Privacy Reasoning in Ambiguous Contexts13 Jun
  4. 2025Design Patterns for Securing LLM Agents against Prompt Injections10 Jun
  5. 2025Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM Agents28 Apr
  6. 2025SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems27 Apr
  7. 2025ShieldAgent: Shielding Agents via Verifiable Safety Policy Reasoning26 Mar
  8. 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Design24 Mar
  9. 2025AgentSpec: Customizable Runtime Enforcement for Safe and Reliable LLM Agents24 Mar
  10. 2025Prompt Flow Integrity to Prevent Privilege Escalation in LLM Agents17 Mar
  11. 2025Multi-Agent Systems Execute Arbitrary Malicious Code15 Mar
  12. 2024Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups4 Nov
6 more
  1. 2024Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Use19 Oct
  2. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
  3. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
  4. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents19 Jun
  5. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May
  6. 2024IsolateGPT: An Execution Isolation Architecture for LLM-Based Agentic Systems8 Mar

Other references · 38

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  4. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
  5. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  6. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  7. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  8. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  9. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
  10. 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
  11. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 568
  12. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 550
26 more
  1. 2024The Instruction Hierarchy: Training LLMs to Prioritize Privileged Instructionscited by 441
  2. 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
  3. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
  4. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 328
  5. 2024StruQ: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Structured Queriescited by 325
  6. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
  7. 2024SafeDecoding: Defending against Jailbreak Attacks via Safety-Aware Decodingcited by 233
  8. 2024SecAlign: Defending Against Prompt Injection with Preference Optimizationcited by 179
  9. 2025APIGen-MT: Agentic Pipeline for Multi-Turn Data Generation via Simulated Agent-Human Interplaycited by 158
  10. 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 150
  11. 2023Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Gamecited by 135
  12. 2024LLM Multi-Agent Systems: Challenges and Open Problemscited by 119
  13. 2024System-Level Defense against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks: An Information Flow Control Perspectivecited by 91
  14. 2023Jatmo: Prompt Injection Defense by Task-Specific Finetuningcited by 89
  15. 2024Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMscited by 82
  16. 2024PERSONA: A Reproducible Testbed for Pluralistic Alignmentcited by 71
  17. 2025Authenticated Delegation and Authorized AI Agentscited by 63
  18. 2025Contextual Agent Security: A Policy for Every Purposecited by 55
  19. 2025Plan-Then-Execute: An Empirical Study of User Trust and Team Performance When Using LLM Agents As A Daily Assistantcited by 54
  20. 2025ACE: A Security Architecture for LLM-Integrated App Systemscited by 52
  21. 2025Magentic-UI: Towards Human-in-the-loop Agentic Systemscited by 41
  22. 2025CowPilot: A Framework for Autonomous and Human-Agent Collaborative Web Navigationcited by 35
  23. 2024Cedar: A New Language for Expressive, Fast, Safe, and Analyzable Authorization (Extended Version)cited by 31
  24. 2025ASIDE: Architectural Separation of Instructions and Data in Language Modelscited by 21
  25. 2025Towards Automating Data Access Permissions in AI Agentscited by 20
  26. 2017The Feasibility of Dynamically Granted Permissions: Aligning Mobile Privacy with User Preferencescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Capability Gates Are Not Authorization: Confused-Deputy Failures in LLM Agent Frameworks
  2. 2026AgentGuard: An Attribute-Based Access Control Framework for Tool-Use LLM-Based Agent
  3. 2026OverAct: Measuring and Mitigating Proactive Over-Authorization in LLM Tool-Calling Agents
  4. 2026OpenClaw PRISM: A Zero-Fork, Defense-in-Depth Runtime Security Layer for Tool-Augmented LLM Agents
  5. 2026Securing LLM Agents Need Intent-to-Execution Integrity
  6. 2026Agentao: A Policy-Governed Runtime Harness for Embeddable Tool-Using LLM Agents
  7. 2026The Stochastic Deputy: Structural Tenant Isolation for Tool-Using LLM Agents
  8. 2026ToolFence: Fine-Grained Authorization for Secure Tool-Using LLM Agents