mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents

arXiv 2506.10171 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents have begun to appear as personal assistants, customer service bots, and clinical aides. While these applications deliver substantial operational benefits, they also require continuous access to sensitive data, which increases the likelihood of unauthorized disclosures. Moreover, these disclosures go beyond mere explicit disclosure, leaving open avenues for gradual manipulation or sidechannel information leakage. This study proposes an auditing framework for conversational privacy that quantifies an agent's susceptibility to these risks. The proposed Conversational Manipulation for Privacy Leakage (CMPL) framework is designed to stress-test agents that enforce strict privacy directives against an iterative probing strategy. Rather than focusing solely on a single disclosure event or purely explicit leakage, CMPL simulates realistic multi-turn interactions to systematically uncover latent vulnerabilities. Our evaluation on diverse domains, data modalities, and safety configurations demonstrates the auditing framework's ability to reveal privacy risks that are not deterred by existing single-turn defenses, along with an in-depth longitudinal study of the temporal dynamics of leakage, strategies adopted by adaptive adversaries, and the evolution of adversarial beliefs about sensitive targets. In addition to introducing CMPL as a diagnostic tool, the paper delivers (1) an auditing procedure grounded in quantifiable risk metrics and (2) an open benchmark for evaluation of conversational privacy across agent implementations.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 1 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

Builds on

1 of 29 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents
  2. 2025MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
  3. 2026Got a Secret? LLM Agents Can't Keep It: Evaluating Privacy in Multi-Agent Systems
  4. 2023"It's a Fair Game", or Is It? Examining How Users Navigate Disclosure Risks and Benefits When Using LLM-Based Conversational Agents
  5. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  6. 2026Loose Lips: Understanding Privacy Leakage in Agentic Dialogue
  7. 2026OCELOT: Inference-Leakage Budgets for Privacy-Preserving LLM Agents
  8. 2026The Claws in Plain Sight: Unauthorized Context Disclosure through LLM Agent Tool Calls