mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PrivacyPeek: Auditing What LLM-Based Agents Acquire, Not Just What They Say

arXiv 2606.00152 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-based agents are rapidly advancing, autonomously invoking external tools to complete multi-step tasks for users. However, agents often acquire more sensitive information than the task requires. Existing privacy benchmarks audit what the agent's response or outgoing actions disclose, but overlook the acquisition stage where data first enters the agent's context. The over-acquired information is then one careless action or one attack away from an outright leak. To assess its prevalence, we introduce PrivacyPeek, a benchmark for evaluating acquisition-stage privacy leakage of LLM-based agents, with 1,182 cases across 7 acquisition behaviours and 16 application domains. Specifically, Acquisition Inspection examines the agent's tool-call trajectory, both the tools it invokes and the data it receives, to detect when it acquires sensitive information beyond the task scope. Probe Elicitation then issues a follow-up probe and measures how readily an attacker could elicit sensitive information the agent acquired but did not disclose. Our experiments on 10 LLM-based agents across 4 model families show that the unnecessary acquisition of sensitive information is widespread. In addition, we observe a correlation between the task-completion capability and acquisition-stage leakage. Prompt-level defences reduce only a small fraction of acquisition-stage leakage, leaving the majority unmitigated. These results make auditing acquisition-stage privacy both urgent and necessary. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/Xuan269/PrivacyPeek-Resource.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026AgentRaft: Automated Detection of Data Over-Exposure in LLM Agents8 Mar
  2. 2026AgentSCOPE: Evaluating Contextual Privacy Across Agentic Workflows5 Mar
  3. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents12 Mar
  4. 2024AgentHarm: A Benchmark for Measuring Harmfulness of LLM Agents11 Oct
  5. 2024Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents3 Oct
  6. 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul

Other references · 10

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  5. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  6. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  7. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 218
  8. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 161
  9. 2025A Survey of LLM-based Agents in Medicine: How far are we from Baymax?cited by 84
  10. 2026Do LLMs Know What Is Private Internally? Probing and Steering Contextual Privacy Norms in Large Language Model Representationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ASLEval: Measuring Privacy Exposure Displacement in LLM Agent Sessions
  2. 2026Observable Channels, Not Just Storage: Evaluating Privacy Leakage in LLM Agent Pipelines
  3. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
  4. 2026CIPL: A Channel-Aware Framework for Recoverable Privacy Leakage in LLM Agents
  5. 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents
  6. 2026AgentPrivArena: Evaluating and Auditing Real-world AI Agent Privacy
  7. 2026AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents
  8. 2025Exposing LLM User Privacy via Traffic Fingerprint Analysis: A Study of Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Interactions