mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BankerToolBench: Evaluating AI Agents in End-to-End Investment Banking Workflows

arXiv 2604.11304 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing AI benchmarks lack the fidelity to assess economically meaningful progress on professional workflows. To evaluate frontier AI agents in a high-value, labor-intensive profession, we introduce BankerToolBench (BTB): an open-source benchmark of end-to-end analytical workflows routinely performed by junior investment bankers. To develop an ecologically valid benchmark grounded in representative work environments, we collaborated with 502 investment bankers from leading firms. BTB requires agents to execute senior banker requests by navigating data rooms, using industry tools (market data platform, SEC filings database), and generating multi-file deliverables--including Excel financial models, PowerPoint pitch decks, and PDF/Word reports. Completing a BTB task takes bankers up to 21 hours, underscoring the economic stakes of successfully delegating this work to AI. BTB enables automated evaluation of any LLM or agent, scoring deliverables against 100+ rubric criteria defined by veteran investment bankers to capture stakeholder utility. Testing 9 frontier models, we find that even the best-performing model (GPT-5.4) fails nearly half of the rubric criteria and bankers rate 0% of its outputs as client-ready. Our failure analysis reveals key obstacles (such as breakdowns in cross-artifact consistency) and improvement directions for agentic AI in high-stakes professional workflows.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2026.

Builds on

15 of 58 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  4. 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
  5. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
  6. 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 429
  7. 2025GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Taskscited by 158
  8. 2022MultiHiertt: Numerical Reasoning over Multi Hierarchical Tabular and Textual Datacited by 121
  9. 2025Finance Agent Benchmark: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-world Financial Research Taskscited by 65
  10. 2025PRBench: Large-Scale Expert Rubrics for Evaluating High-Stakes Professional Reasoningcited by 32
  11. 2026Autorubric: A Unifying Framework for Rubric-Based LLM Evaluation on Non-Verifiable Taskscited by 26
  12. 2025ProfBench: Multi-Domain Rubrics requiring Professional Knowledge to Answer and Judgecited by 24
3 more
  1. 2026An Imperfect Verifier is Good Enough: Learning with Noisy Rewardscited by 13
  2. 2026RepoMod-Bench: A Benchmark for Code Repository Modernization via Implementation-Agnostic Testingcited by 3
  3. 2026Re-Evaluating EVMBench: Are AI Agents Ready for Smart Contract Security?cited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MBABench: Evaluating LLM Agents on End-to-End Spreadsheet Tasks in Finance
  2. 2026FrontierFinance: A Challenging Benchmark for Measuring Frontier Intelligence of Finance Agents
  3. 2026BigFinanceBench: A Workflow-Grounded Benchmark for Financial-Research Agents
  4. 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows
  5. 2026FinToolBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Real-World Financial Tool Use
  6. 2026BlueFin: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Financial Spreadsheets
  7. 2026OpenFinGym: A Verifiable Multi-Task Gym Environment for Evaluating Quant Agents
  8. 2026FORCE-Bench: A Benchmark, Dataset, and Evaluation Harness for Agentic AI in Enterprise Finance