mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CEO-Bench: Can Agents Play the Long Game?

arXiv 2606.18543 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.CL cs.SEcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Language model agents are becoming proficient executors at isolated, short-horizon tasks such as software engineering and customer service. Yet real-world challenges require a combination of sophisticated skills that remain largely untested in agents: (1) navigating long horizons amid uncertainty; (2) acquiring information in noisy environments; (3) adapting to a changing world; (4) orchestrating multiple moving parts toward a coherent goal. We introduce CEO-Bench, which evaluates these capabilities together by simulating a representative real-world task: operating a startup for 500 days. An agent manages pricing, marketing, budgeting, and many other aspects of a fictional company through a programmable Python interface, operating in the same environment and facing the same challenges as a human CEO. Success demands analyzing noisy, interconnected business databases, translating signals into sound strategy, and coordinating many decisions with programming. The strongest agents write sophisticated code that forecasts churn regimes, billing timing, customer losses, and future cash under different scenarios. Even so, most state-of-the-art models struggle in this environment. Only Claude Fable 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Claude Opus 4.8 finish above the 1M starting balance, and all evaluated models remain below the rule-based baseline. CEO-Bench takes a first step toward measuring the intelligence required to drive sustained, adaptive progress over time.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 33 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

33 of 48 references.

Closest ancestors · 9

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026textttYC-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Long-Term Planning and Consistent Execution1 Apr
  2. 2025UltraHorizon: Benchmarking Agent Capabilities in Ultra Long-Horizon Scenarios26 Sep
  3. 2025OdysseyBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Complex Office Application Workflows12 Aug
  4. 2025Vending-Bench: A Benchmark for Long-Term Coherence of Autonomous Agents20 Feb
  5. 2024TheAgentCompany: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Consequential Real World Tasks18 Dec
  6. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
  7. 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agents2 Feb
  8. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan
  9. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents7 Aug

Other references · 24

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  6. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  7. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  8. 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,270
  9. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,134
  10. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,084
  11. 2024LongMemEval: Benchmarking Chat Assistants on Long-Term Interactive Memorycited by 656
  12. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 429
12 more
  1. 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 359
  2. 2024WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks?cited by 348
  3. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 286
  4. 2025Evaluating Memory in LLM Agents via Incremental Multi-Turn Interactionscited by 236
  5. 2022In-context Reinforcement Learning with Algorithm Distillationcited by 186
  6. 2024AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks?cited by 155
  7. 2025GDPval: Evaluating AI Model Performance on Real-World Economically Valuable Taskscited by 142
  8. 2023SmartPlay: A Benchmark for LLMs as Intelligent Agentscited by 123
  9. 2025SWE-Lancer: Can Frontier LLMs Earn 1 Million from Real-World Freelance Software Engineering?cited by 99
  10. 2026MemoryArena: Benchmarking Agent Memory in Interdependent Multi-Session Agentic Taskscited by 72
  11. 2023TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Modelscited by 59
  12. 2024LLMs Are In-Context Bandit Reinforcement Learnerscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Can LLMs Be CEOs? Benchmarking Strategic Resource Reallocation with Multi-Role Agent Simulation
  2. 2026Can LLM Agents Be CFOs? Benchmarking Long-Horizon Resource Allocation in an Uncertain Enterprise Environment
  3. 2026E-Commerce Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Autonomous Business Operation
  4. 2026OneMillion-Bench: How Far are Language Agents from Human Experts?
  5. 2026StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
  6. 2026HANDBOOK.md: A Benchmark for Long-Context Agentic Instruction Following
  7. 2026Agent Skills: A Data-Driven Analysis of Claude Skills for Extending Large Language Model Functionality
  8. 2026EntWorld: A Holistic Environment and Benchmark for Verifiable Enterprise GUI Agents