mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

EnterpriseBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Enterprise-Level Strategic Reasoning and Decision-Making

arXiv 2609.37658 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents are increasingly expected to support enterprise workflows, where tasks often involve missing information, uncertainty, feedback, and long-term trade-offs. However, existing enterprise and financial benchmarks mainly test static capabilities such as information extraction, numerical calculation, domain knowledge, and financial QA, leaving interactive and long-horizon decision-making underexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce EnterpriseBench, a benchmark that evaluates LLM agents across this spectrum, from static question answering to dynamic decision-making. Specifically, EnterpriseBench reorganizes existing enterprise and financial QA datasets into a unified foundational suite annotated by capability and difficulty, and introduces three professional interactive settings: Consulting, based on management-consulting-style business cases for client problem diagnosis through multi-turn information seeking; the Beer Game, adapted from a classic supply-chain management simulation for inventory control under delayed feedback; and Enterprise Digital Twin, a project-based business simulator for workforce, risk, and project planning. Experiments with nine agent methods under four backbone models show that current agents have not yet achieved stable, comprehensive, and cross-task reliability in enterprise scenarios. These results show that EnterpriseBench provides a practical benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in realistic enterprise strategic reasoning and decision-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 46 references.

References · 11

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  2. 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,143
  3. 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 724
  4. 2018BabyAI: A Platform to Study the Sample Efficiency of Grounded Language Learningcited by 238
  5. 2024TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Frameworkcited by 182
  6. 2023ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Expertscited by 140
  7. 2025xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluationscited by 118
  8. 2025Agent Learning via Early Experiencecited by 79
  9. 2025StockBench: Can LLM Agents Trade Stocks Profitably In Real-world Markets?cited by 43
  10. 2025WebChoreArena: Evaluating Web Browsing Agents on Realistic Tedious Web Taskscited by 29
  11. 2025FinTagging: Benchmarking LLMs for Extracting and Structuring Financial Informationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ERPBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Enterprise Decision-Making Across Competitive Market Ecologies
  2. 2025Can LLMs Help You at Work? A Sandbox for Evaluating LLM Agents in Enterprise Environments
  3. 2026Business Arena: Benchmarking LLM Agents in a Realistic Marketplace
  4. 2025From Bits to Boardrooms: A Cutting-Edge Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Business Excellence
  5. 2026E-Commerce Bench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Autonomous Business Operation
  6. 2026MBABench: Evaluating LLM Agents on End-to-End Spreadsheet Tasks in Finance
  7. 2025Benchmarking LLM Agents for Wealth-Management Workflows
  8. 2026Opti-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking End-to-End Optimization R&D Agents on Real-World Business Problems