Agentic Incident Response through Digital Twin-Enhanced Multiscale Planning
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Incident response is currently managed by security operators using predefined playbooks, resulting in slow, labor-intensive security decision-making processes. Consequently, there is a growing need for automated incident response planning. Decision-theoretic approaches based on control, optimization, and reinforcement learning have been proposed to automate such planning tasks with well-grounded approaches, yet most of which, while guaranteeing strong performance, are limited to abstract models and cannot be directly applied to operational systems. A promising approach to mitigate this limitation is to use the security knowledge embedded in large language models (LLMs) to develop agentic response systems. However, current agentic approaches rely on repeated invocations of the LLM to generate a response plan, which is unreliable and limits the planning horizon due to hallucination. In this paper, we develop a principled LLM-based planning method by combining decision-theoretic planning with LLM-generated response commands. The proposed agentic incident response approach uses a rollout planner to compute a high-level response strategy that allocates security resources (the tactical scale), which is then translated into executable commands by a lightweight LLM agent (the operational scale). Within this architecture, we use a digital twin that supports tactical planning through simulation and operational execution through emulation. Across three attack scenarios, our agentic approach reduces recovery execution time by 15.1% on average and increases the recovery rate by 33.6% over frontier LLM baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2026.
Builds on
23 of 53 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026In-Context Autonomous Network Incident Response: An End-to-End Large Language Model Agent Approach13 Feb
- 2025Agentic AI for Cyber Resilience: A New Security Paradigm and Its System-Theoretic Foundations28 Dec
- 2024Depending on yourself when you should: Mentoring LLM with RL agents to become the master in cybersecurity games26 Mar
Other references · 20
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Securitycited by 95
- 2025CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scalecited by 78
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 71
- 2021The Confluence of Networks, Games and Learningcited by 26
- 2025Large Language Models are Autonomous Cyber Defenderscited by 15
- 2024Conjectural Online Learning with First-order Beliefs in Asymmetric Information Stochastic Gamescited by 14
- 2024Automated Security Response through Online Learning with Adaptive Conjecturescited by 13
- 2025IRCopilot: Automated Incident Response with Large Language Modelscited by 13
- 2022Self-Adaptive Driving in Nonstationary Environments through Conjectural Online Lookahead Adaptationcited by 12
- 2023Scenario-Agnostic Zero-Trust Defense with Explainable Threshold Policy: A Meta-Learning Approachcited by 12
8 more
- 2023Introducing a New Alert Data Set for Multi-Step Attack Analysiscited by 12
- 2023Digital Twin-Enhanced Wireless Indoor Navigation: Achieving Efficient Environment Sensing with Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucinationcited by 10
- 2024Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfarecited by 8
- 2024Model Predictive Control and Reinforcement Learning: A Unified Framework Based on Dynamic Programmingcited by 7
- 2023Decision-Dominant Strategic Defense Against Lateral Movement for 5G Zero-Trust Multi-Domain Networkscited by 6
- 2025Online Incident Response Planning under Model Misspecification through Bayesian Learning and Belief Quantizationcited by 5
- 2026CSLE: A Reinforcement Learning Platform for Autonomous Security Managementcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Multi-Agent Collaboration in Incident Response with Large Language Models
- 2026AIR: Improving Agent Safety through Incident Response
- 2023LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing
- 2026STAIR: Effective Incident Response Using an End-to-End Agentic Planning Framework
- 2026LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment
- 2026Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look
- 2026Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models into Lightweight Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Cyber Operations
- 2025D-CIPHER: Dynamic Collaborative Intelligent Multi-Agent System with Planner and Heterogeneous Executors for Offensive Security