IRCopilot: Automated Incident Response with Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Incident response plays a pivotal role in mitigating the impact of cyber attacks. In recent years, the intensity and complexity of global cyber threats have grown significantly, making it increasingly challenging for traditional threat detection and incident response methods to operate effectively in complex network environments. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great potential in early threat detection, their capabilities remain limited when it comes to automated incident response after an intrusion. To address this gap, we construct an incremental benchmark based on real-world incident response tasks to thoroughly evaluate the performance of LLMs in this domain. Our analysis reveals several key challenges that hinder the practical application of contemporary LLMs, including context loss, hallucinations, privacy protection concerns, and their limited ability to provide accurate, context-specific recommendations. In response to these challenges, we propose IRCopilot, a novel framework for automated incident response powered by LLMs. IRCopilot mimics the three dynamic phases of a real-world incident response team using four collaborative LLM-based session components. These components are designed with clear divisions of responsibility, reducing issues such as hallucinations and context loss. Our method leverages diverse prompt designs and strategic responsibility segmentation, significantly improving the system's practicality and efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that IRCopilot outperforms baseline LLMs across key benchmarks, achieving sub-task completion rates of 150%, 138%, 136%, 119%, and 114% for various response tasks. Moreover, IRCopilot exhibits robust performance on public incident response platforms and in real-world attack scenarios, showcasing its strong applicability.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 8.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucinationcited by 10
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2025Toward Cybersecurity-Expert Small Language Modelscited by 4
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agentscited by 3
- 2025The Evolution of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: From Single LLM Reasoners to Multi-Agent Systems and Autonomous Pipelinescited by 2
- 2025Advancing LLM-Based Security Automation with Customized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Zero-Touch Networkscited by 2
- 2026Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Redditcited by 1
- 2026Challenges and Future Directions in Agentic Reverse Engineering Systemscited by 1
- 2026Decomposing Memorization Reduction in Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning of SLMs for CSIRTscited by 1
- 2026SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Responsecited by 1
- 2026Agentic Incident Response through Digital Twin-Enhanced Multiscale Planningcited by 1
- 2026STAIR: Effective Incident Response Using an End-to-End Agentic Planning Frameworkcited by 1
1 more
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environments20 Aug 2026
- 2026STAIR: Effective Incident Response Using an End-to-End Agentic Planning Framework10 Aug 2026
- 2026Agentic Incident Response through Digital Twin-Enhanced Multiscale Planning3 Aug 2026
- 2026SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response29 Jul 2026
- 2026Decomposing Memorization Reduction in Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning of SLMs for CSIRTs26 Jun 2026
- 2026Challenges and Future Directions in Agentic Reverse Engineering Systems15 Apr 2026
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents13 Apr 2026
- 2026Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit11 Apr 2026
- 2025Advancing LLM-Based Security Automation with Customized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Zero-Touch Networks10 Dec 2025
- 2025The Evolution of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: From Single LLM Reasoners to Multi-Agent Systems and Autonomous Pipelines7 Dec 2025
- 2025Toward Cybersecurity-Expert Small Language Models15 Oct 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey13 Sep 2025
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agentscited by 3
- 2025The Evolution of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: From Single LLM Reasoners to Multi-Agent Systems and Autonomous Pipelinescited by 2
- 2026Challenges and Future Directions in Agentic Reverse Engineering Systemscited by 1
- 2026SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Responsecited by 1
- 2026Agentic Incident Response through Digital Twin-Enhanced Multiscale Planningcited by 1
- 2026STAIR: Effective Incident Response Using an End-to-End Agentic Planning Frameworkcited by 1
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environmentscited by 1
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environments20 Aug 2026
- 2026STAIR: Effective Incident Response Using an End-to-End Agentic Planning Framework10 Aug 2026
- 2026Agentic Incident Response through Digital Twin-Enhanced Multiscale Planning3 Aug 2026
- 2026SecRespond: Benchmarking AI Agents for Real-World Post-Compromise Incident Response29 Jul 2026
- 2026Challenges and Future Directions in Agentic Reverse Engineering Systems15 Apr 2026
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents13 Apr 2026
- 2025The Evolution of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: From Single LLM Reasoners to Multi-Agent Systems and Autonomous Pipelines7 Dec 2025
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucinationcited by 10
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2025Toward Cybersecurity-Expert Small Language Modelscited by 4
- 2025Advancing LLM-Based Security Automation with Customized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Zero-Touch Networkscited by 2
- 2026Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Redditcited by 1
- 2026Decomposing Memorization Reduction in Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning of SLMs for CSIRTscited by 1
- 2026Decomposing Memorization Reduction in Privacy-Preserving Fine-Tuning of SLMs for CSIRTs26 Jun 2026
- 2026Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit11 Apr 2026
- 2025Advancing LLM-Based Security Automation with Customized Group Relative Policy Optimization for Zero-Touch Networks10 Dec 2025
- 2025Toward Cybersecurity-Expert Small Language Models15 Oct 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey13 Sep 2025
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucination7 Aug 2025