mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

In-Context Autonomous Network Incident Response: An End-to-End Large Language Model Agent Approach

arXiv 2602.13156 ↗First posted 13 Feb 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Rapidly evolving cyberattacks demand incident response systems that can autonomously learn and adapt to changing threats. Prior work has extensively explored the reinforcement learning approach, which involves learning response strategies through extensive simulation of the incident. While this approach can be effective, it requires handcrafted modeling of the simulator and suppresses useful semantics from raw system logs and alerts. To address these limitations, we propose to leverage large language models' (LLM) pre-trained security knowledge and in-context learning to create an end-to-end agentic solution for incident response planning. Specifically, our agent integrates four functionalities, perception, reasoning, planning, and action, into one lightweight LLM (14b model). Through fine-tuning and chain-of-thought reasoning, our LLM agent is capable of processing system logs and inferring the underlying network state (perception), updating its conjecture of attack models (reasoning), simulating consequences under different response strategies (planning), and generating an effective response (action). By comparing LLM-simulated outcomes with actual observations, the LLM agent repeatedly refines its attack conjecture and corresponding response, thereby demonstrating in-context adaptation. Our agentic approach is free of modeling and can run on commodity hardware. When evaluated on incident logs reported in the literature, our agent achieves recovery up to 23% faster than those of frontier LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2026.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Depending on yourself when you should: Mentoring LLM with RL agents to become the master in cybersecurity games26 Mar

Other references · 10

  1. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,655
  2. 2024Conjectural Online Learning with First-order Beliefs in Asymmetric Information Stochastic Gamescited by 14
  3. 2025Large Language Models are Autonomous Cyber Defenderscited by 14
  4. 2022Self-Adaptive Driving in Nonstationary Environments through Conjectural Online Lookahead Adaptationcited by 12
  5. 2023Scenario-Agnostic Zero-Trust Defense with Explainable Threshold Policy: A Meta-Learning Approachcited by 12
  6. 2023Introducing a New Alert Data Set for Multi-Step Attack Analysiscited by 12
  7. 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucinationcited by 10
  8. 2024Intrusion Tolerance for Networked Systems through Two-Level Feedback Controlcited by 8
  9. 2024Symbiotic Game and Foundation Models for Cyber Deception Operations in Strategic Cyber Warfarecited by 7
  10. 2025Online Incident Response Planning under Model Misspecification through Bayesian Learning and Belief Quantizationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Out of the Cage: How Stochastic Parrots Win in Cyber Security Environments
  2. 2026Distilling Knowledge from Large Language Models into Lightweight Reinforcement Learning Agents for Autonomous Cyber Operations
  3. 2023LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing
  4. 2026Ask the Expert: LLM-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Cyber Defense
  5. 2025AgentCyTE: Leveraging Agentic AI to Generate Cybersecurity Training & Experimentation Scenarios
  6. 2024Multi-Agent Collaboration in Incident Response with Large Language Models
  7. 2026BlueSTAR: Tiered Agentic Architecture for Autonomous Cyber Defense
  8. 2026A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems