Semantic Hardness Is Not Visual Hardness: Sign-Aware Hard Negative Mining for Sign Language Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sign Language Retrieval (SLRet) enables efficient access to sign language content but remains fragile in fine-grained scenarios where visually similar signs must be distinguished. We show that this limitation does not stem from model capacity, but from ineffective hard negative supervision. Specifically, we formulate fine-grained retrieval failures as a negative distribution mismatch: semantically distinct yet visually confusable signs are rarely treated as hard negatives, while existing text-based mining strategies fail to capture such visual ambiguity. To address this issue, we propose Sign-Aware Hard Negative Mining (SAN), which constructs hard negatives based on visual confusability in the sign embedding space rather than linguistic similarity. Experiments on PHOENIX-2014T demonstrate that SAN substantially improves fine-grained retrieval performance while preserving coarse-grained accuracy, highlighting the importance of aligning negative supervision with visual ambiguity in sign language retrieval.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.
Builds on
22 of 32 references.
References · 22
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
- 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 254
- 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 194
- 2018MS-ASL: A Large-Scale Data Set and Benchmark for Understanding American Sign Languagecited by 118
- 2020BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cuescited by 106
- 2023Gloss-free Sign Language Translation: Improving from Visual-Language Pretrainingcited by 104
- 2021Skeleton Aware Multi-modal Sign Language Recognitioncited by 101
- 2023Verbs in Action: Improving verb understanding in video-language modelscited by 76
- 2024LLMs are Good Sign Language Translatorscited by 76
10 more
- 2021SignBERT: Pre-Training of Hand-Model-Aware Representation for Sign Language Recognitioncited by 59
- 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 57
- 2023Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understandingcited by 40
- 2023BEST: BERT Pre-Training for Sign Language Recognition with Coupling Tokenizationcited by 35
- 2021Read and Attend: Temporal Localisation in Sign Language Videoscited by 34
- 2023CiCo: Domain-Aware Sign Language Retrieval via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learningcited by 32
- 2021Sign Language Production: A Reviewcited by 26
- 2022Sign Language Video Retrieval with Free-Form Textual Queriescited by 21
- 2024Uncertainty-aware sign language video retrieval with probability distribution modelingcited by 6
- 2024SEDS: Semantically Enhanced Dual-Stream Encoder for Sign Language Retrievalcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.