mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic Hardness Is Not Visual Hardness: Sign-Aware Hard Negative Mining for Sign Language Retrieval

arXiv 2607.09263 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sign Language Retrieval (SLRet) enables efficient access to sign language content but remains fragile in fine-grained scenarios where visually similar signs must be distinguished. We show that this limitation does not stem from model capacity, but from ineffective hard negative supervision. Specifically, we formulate fine-grained retrieval failures as a negative distribution mismatch: semantically distinct yet visually confusable signs are rarely treated as hard negatives, while existing text-based mining strategies fail to capture such visual ambiguity. To address this issue, we propose Sign-Aware Hard Negative Mining (SAN), which constructs hard negatives based on visual confusability in the sign embedding space rather than linguistic similarity. Experiments on PHOENIX-2014T demonstrate that SAN substantially improves fine-grained retrieval performance while preserving coarse-grained accuracy, highlighting the importance of aligning negative supervision with visual ambiguity in sign language retrieval.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
  3. 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 331
  4. 2020Sign Language Transformers: Joint End-to-end Sign Language Recognition and Translationcited by 254
  5. 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
  6. 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 194
  7. 2018MS-ASL: A Large-Scale Data Set and Benchmark for Understanding American Sign Languagecited by 118
  8. 2020BSL-1K: Scaling up co-articulated sign language recognition using mouthing cuescited by 106
  9. 2023Gloss-free Sign Language Translation: Improving from Visual-Language Pretrainingcited by 104
  10. 2021Skeleton Aware Multi-modal Sign Language Recognitioncited by 101
  11. 2023Verbs in Action: Improving verb understanding in video-language modelscited by 76
  12. 2024LLMs are Good Sign Language Translatorscited by 76
10 more
  1. 2021SignBERT: Pre-Training of Hand-Model-Aware Representation for Sign Language Recognitioncited by 59
  2. 2024TripletCLIP: Improving Compositional Reasoning of CLIP via Synthetic Vision-Language Negativescited by 57
  3. 2023Contrasting Intra-Modal and Ranking Cross-Modal Hard Negatives to Enhance Visio-Linguistic Compositional Understandingcited by 40
  4. 2023BEST: BERT Pre-Training for Sign Language Recognition with Coupling Tokenizationcited by 35
  5. 2021Read and Attend: Temporal Localisation in Sign Language Videoscited by 34
  6. 2023CiCo: Domain-Aware Sign Language Retrieval via Cross-Lingual Contrastive Learningcited by 32
  7. 2021Sign Language Production: A Reviewcited by 26
  8. 2022Sign Language Video Retrieval with Free-Form Textual Queriescited by 21
  9. 2024Uncertainty-aware sign language video retrieval with probability distribution modelingcited by 6
  10. 2024SEDS: Semantically Enhanced Dual-Stream Encoder for Sign Language Retrievalcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.