Geometry-Grounded Articulation and Test-Time Adaptation for Zero-Shot, Scalable Shape Matching in the Wild
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dense correspondence on in-the-wild 3D scans must handle severe non-isometric deformation, partial observations, topology artifacts, irregular discretization, and extreme resolution. Together, these conditions make shape matching both a robustness and scalability problem. Existing methods typically handle only part of this regime and often require expensive spectral or dense feature processing, repeated pairwise optimization, or dataset-specific training. To address the above issues, we present GAMMA, a zero-shot framework based on Geometry-Grounded Articulation. For each scan, GAMMA renders multiple views and uses a pretrained estimator with a category-specific parametric model to produce one template estimate per view. Because these estimates share a fixed vertex ordering, confidence-weighted consensus fuses them into one canonical template and establishes sparse matches across scans. We refine these matches on the input geometry to recover accurate dense correspondences. All core matching steps run at inference time and require neither target-dataset correspondence training nor costly Laplace--Beltrami operator (LBO) computation on the input scans. Each fused template is cached, so additional pair queries reuse the canonicalization. GAMMA obtains average geodesic errors of 2.9 on TOPKIDS and 2.4 on remeshed SMAL, reducing error relative to URSSM by 67% and 60%, respectively. Complementary evaluations report lower aggregate errors than the evaluated baselines on BeCoS-processed partial subsets and demonstrate stable matching accuracy from decimated FAUST meshes to raw scans with 160k--200k vertices. These results demonstrate accurate correspondence across complementary settings and collection-level scalability after per-shape caching.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.
Builds on
29 of 51 references.
References · 29
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2019Expressive Body Capture: 3D Hands, Face, and Body from a Single Imagecited by 1,603
- 20163D Menagerie: Modeling the 3D shape and pose of animalscited by 311
- 2020STAR: Sparse Trained Articulated Human Body Regressorcited by 194
- 20183D-CODED : 3D Correspondences by Deep Deformationcited by 160
- 2017Deep Functional Maps: Structured Prediction for Dense Shape Correspondencecited by 134
- 2020Deep Geometric Functional Maps: Robust Feature Learning for Shape Correspondencecited by 125
- 2020Deformed Implicit Field: Modeling 3D Shapes with Learned Dense Correspondencecited by 119
- 2020Deep Implicit Templates for 3D Shape Representationcited by 86
- 2018Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structured Shape Matchingcited by 81
- 2021NeuroMorph: Unsupervised Shape Interpolation and Correspondence in One Gocited by 81
- 2018Continuous and Orientation-preserving Correspondences via Functional Mapscited by 77
17 more
- 2024Learning the 3D Fauna of the Webcited by 58
- 2023Unsupervised Learning of Robust Spectral Shape Matchingcited by 57
- 2023Diffusion 3D Features (Diff3F): Decorating Untextured Shapes with Distilled Semantic Featurescited by 55
- 2020Human Mesh Recovery from Multiple Shotscited by 52
- 2022Learning Multi-resolution Functional Maps with Spectral Attention for Robust Shape Matchingcited by 35
- 2024DenseMatcher: Learning 3D Semantic Correspondence for Category-Level Manipulation from a Single Democited by 34
- 2024Spectral Meets Spatial: Harmonising 3D Shape Matching and Interpolationcited by 26
- 2024AniMer: Animal Pose and Shape Estimation Using Family Aware Transformercited by 20
- 2024Memory-Scalable and Simplified Functional Map Learningcited by 14
- 2025Hierarchical Neural Semantic Representation for 3D Semantic Correspondencecited by 14
- 2024Beyond Complete Shapes: A Benchmark for Quantitative Evaluation of 3D Shape Surface Matching Algorithmscited by 11
- 2023Self-supervised Learning of Implicit Shape Representation with Dense Correspondence for Deformable Objectscited by 8
- 2024Synchronous Diffusion for Unsupervised Smooth Non-Rigid 3D Shape Matchingcited by 7
- 2026From Feature Learning to Spectral Basis Learning: A Unifying and Flexible Framework for Efficient and Robust Shape Matchingcited by 2
- 2026Universal 3D Shape Matching via Coarse-to-Fine Language Guidancecited by 1
- 2026GLASS: Graph and Vision-Language Assisted Semantic Shape Correspondencecited by 1
- 2026SGSoft: Learning Fused Semantic-Geometric Features for 3D Shape Correspondence via Template-Guided Soft Signalscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.