mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GroundControl: Anticipating Navigation Failures in Vision-Language Agents via Trajectory-Consistent Uncertainty Estimates

arXiv 2606.20479 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.ROcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language navigation agents achieve competitive average success on benchmark tasks, yet failures often arise through predictable trajectory-level breakdowns such as oscillation, stagnation, or inefficient detours. Reliable deployment, therefore, requires uncertainty signals that anticipate emerging failure dynamics during execution rather than reflect only instantaneous action entropy. We introduce GroundControl, a trajectory-consistent uncertainty estimator defined as statistical deviation from nominal goal-directed distance-to-goal dynamics aggregated over an episode. GroundControl models distance evolution using a constant-velocity Kalman filter and combines normalized innovation statistics with complementary trajectory features capturing progress, monotonicity, path efficiency, and oscillatory behavior. The resulting uncertainty score reflects geometric and temporal inconsistency in navigation behavior rather than local prediction dispersion. To evaluate uncertainty quality independently of task success, we formalize Selective Risk--Coverage Navigation (SRCN), a protocol that measures how effectively an uncertainty score ranks episodes by failure or inefficiency using risk--coverage curves and AURC / E-AURC summaries. Across five EB-Navigation splits (N=300 episodes), trajectory-consistent uncertainty achieves near-oracle ordering under success-based selective risk, with weighted-average mathrmE-AURCSR=0.0024 for the GPT-4o model, substantially outperforming entropy-, conformal-, and heuristic baselines. Under SPL-based selective evaluation, GroundControl consistently achieves the lowest AURC and E-AURC across models and navigation splits. These results show that modeling deviation from goal-directed dynamics provides an interpretable and robust signal for anticipating navigation failures in vision-language agents.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025EmbodiedBench: Comprehensive Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for Vision-Driven Embodied Agents13 Feb

Other references · 19

  1. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  2. 2019Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Researchcited by 1,163
  3. 2017Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environmentscited by 1,013
  4. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  5. 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 429
  6. 2020Room-Across-Room: Multilingual Vision-and-Language Navigation with Dense Spatiotemporal Groundingcited by 401
  7. 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 360
  8. 2019Vision-Language Navigation with Self-Supervised Auxiliary Reasoning Taskscited by 177
  9. 2021Auxiliary Tasks and Exploration Enable ObjectNavcited by 73
  10. 2025Embodied Navigation Foundation Modelcited by 65
  11. 2025Learning Conformal Abstention Policies for Adaptive Risk Management in Large Language and Vision-Language Modelscited by 20
  12. 2025VLNVerse: A Benchmark for Vision-Language Navigation with Versatile, Embodied, Realistic Simulation and Evaluationcited by 17
7 more
  1. 2025NaviTrace: Evaluating Embodied Navigation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 13
  2. 2026VLingNav: Embodied Navigation with Adaptive Reasoning and Visual-Assisted Linguistic Memorycited by 10
  3. 2024Vision-Language Navigation with Embodied Intelligence: A Surveycited by 9
  4. 2025Uncertainty in Action: Confidence Elicitation in Embodied Agentscited by 5
  5. 2024Zero-shot Object-Centric Instruction Following: Integrating Foundation Models with Traditional Navigationcited by 4
  6. 2025Embodied Navigation with Auxiliary Task of Action Description Predictioncited by 3
  7. 2021A Self-Supervised Auxiliary Loss for Deep RL in Partially Observable Settingscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Seek Before You Move: Evidence Seeking for Progress Grounding in Vision-Language Navigation
  2. 2025CompassNav: Steering From Path Imitation To Decision Understanding In Navigation
  3. 2026Uncertainty-Gated Exploration Noise Suppresses Task Collapse in Online RL Fine-Tuning of a Flow-Matching Vision-Language-Action Policy
  4. 2026From Uncertainty to Action: Learning to Steer LLM Agents
  5. 2026Trajectory-Diversity-Driven Robust Vision-and-Language Navigation
  6. 2026Temporal Difference Calibration in Sequential Tasks: Application to Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2025Progress-Think: Semantic Progress Reasoning for Vision-Language Navigation
  8. 2026Guided Diffusion with Distilled Vision-Language Reliability for Aerial Navigation