mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minim: Privacy-Aware Minimal View for Agents via Trusted Local Sanitization

arXiv 2606.13949 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern LLM-powered autonomous agents increasingly rely on rich user interface (UI) state observations to achieve reliable action grounding in complex digital environments. However, many deployments transmit the full UI state to remote inference servers even when most elements are irrelevant to the current task, which can leak sensitive but unnecessary context such as authentication codes, private notifications, and background application states. We propose MINIM, a trusted local broker that performs privacy-aware minimization on the client side before any observation leaves the device. Grounded in Contextual Integrity (CI), MINIM learns a dual-score representation for each UI element by predicting an inherent sensitivity score (s) and a task-conditioned necessity score (n). These scores drive a ternary disclosure policy that keeps essential elements, abstracts sensitive attributes when needed, and removes task-irrelevant content. We optimize a CI-aware objective that penalizes necessity errors more strongly on high-risk content, enabling aggressive pruning while preserving task-critical information. Experiments on real-world UI observations derived from WebArena show that MINIM substantially reduces task-irrelevant sensitive leakage while preserving task-critical semantic context and the interactive affordances required for reliable agent actions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents22 Sep
  2. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents12 Mar
  3. 2025A Survey on Trustworthy LLM Agents: Threats and Countermeasures12 Mar
  4. 2025Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents22 Feb
  5. 2025Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent Memory17 Feb
  6. 2024The Emerged Security and Privacy of LLM Agent: A Survey with Case Studies28 Jul
  7. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May

Other references · 19

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  3. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  4. 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
  5. 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
  6. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 218
  7. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 161
  8. 2024GUI Agents: A Surveycited by 101
  9. 2020CrypTFlow2: Practical 2-Party Secure Inferencecited by 82
  10. 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 54
  11. 2025Contextual Integrity in LLMs via Reasoning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
  12. 2025Leaky Thoughts: Large Reasoning Models Are Not Private Thinkerscited by 25
7 more
  1. 2024Evaluating LLM-based Personal Information Extraction and Countermeasurescited by 12
  2. 2026PrivGemo: Privacy-Preserving Dual-Tower Graph Retrieval for Empowering LLM Reasoning with Memory Augmentationcited by 9
  3. 2025PrivWeb: Unobtrusive and Content-aware Privacy Protection For Web Agentscited by 8
  4. 2025Operationalizing Data Minimization for Privacy-Preserving LLM Promptingcited by 8
  5. 2025PII-Bench: Evaluating Query-Aware Privacy Protection Systemscited by 7
  6. 2025PRvL: Quantifying the Capabilities and Risks of Large Language Models for PII Redactioncited by 7
  7. 2025Breaking the Layer Barrier: Remodeling Private Transformer Inference with Hybrid CKKS and MPCcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026POLAR-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Privacy-Utility Trade-offs in LLM Agents
  2. 2026PrivAct: Internalizing Contextual Privacy Preservation via Multi-Agent Preference Training
  3. 2026PiSAs: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Multi-User Agentic Systems
  4. 2026Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agents
  5. 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
  6. 2026AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents
  7. 2026CIPL: A Channel-Aware Framework for Recoverable Privacy Leakage in LLM Agents
  8. 2026The Claws in Plain Sight: Unauthorized Context Disclosure through LLM Agent Tool Calls