PRvL: Quantifying the Capabilities and Risks of Large Language Models for PII Redaction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Redacting Personally Identifiable Information (PII) from unstructured text is critical for ensuring data privacy in regulated domains. While earlier approaches have relied on rule-based systems and domain-specific Named Entity Recognition (NER) models, these methods fail to generalize across formats and contexts. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative, yet the effect of architectural and training choices on redaction performance remains underexplored. LLMs have demonstrated strong performance in tasks that require contextual language understanding, including the redaction of PII in free-form text. Prior work suggests that with appropriate adaptation, LLMs can become effective contextual privacy learners. However, the consequences of architectural and training choices for PII Redaction remain underexplored. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of LLMs as privacy-preserving PII Redaction systems. We evaluate a range of LLM architectures and training strategies for their effectiveness in PII Redaction. Our analysis measures redaction performance, semantic preservation, and PII leakage, and compares these outcomes against latency and computational cost. The results provide practical guidance for configuring LLM-based redactors that are accurate, efficient, and privacy-aware. To support reproducibility and real-world deployment, we release PRvL, an open-source suite of fine-tuned models, and evaluation tools for general-purpose PII Redaction. PRvL is built entirely on open-source LLMs and supports multiple inference settings for flexibility and compliance. It is designed to be easily customized for different domains and fully operable within secure, self-managed environments. This enables data owners to perform redactions without relying on third-party services or exposing sensitive content beyond their own infrastructure.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 6.
7 papers.
- 2026Privasis: Synthesizing the Largest "Public" Private Dataset from Scratchcited by 3
- 2026Minim: Privacy-Aware Minimal View for Agents via Trusted Local Sanitizationcited by 2
- 2026RedacBench: Can AI Erase Your Secrets?cited by 1
- 2026CDR-Bench: Evaluating Faithful Execution of Compositional, Order-Sensitive Data Refinement Recipescited by 1
- 2025A Comparative Study of Light-weight Language Models for PII Masking and their Deployment for Real Conversational Textscited by 0
- 2026PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscationcited by 0
- 2026LeakageBench: Document-Level Leakage Risk for Redacting Personally Identifiable Information in Document Imagescited by 0
- 2026LeakageBench: Document-Level Leakage Risk for Redacting Personally Identifiable Information in Document Images2 Sep 2026
- 2026PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscation3 Jul 2026
- 2026CDR-Bench: Evaluating Faithful Execution of Compositional, Order-Sensitive Data Refinement Recipes30 Jun 2026
- 2026Minim: Privacy-Aware Minimal View for Agents via Trusted Local Sanitization11 Jun 2026
- 2026RedacBench: Can AI Erase Your Secrets?2 Mar 2026
- 2026Privasis: Synthesizing the Largest "Public" Private Dataset from Scratch3 Feb 2026
- 2025A Comparative Study of Light-weight Language Models for PII Masking and their Deployment for Real Conversational Texts21 Dec 2025