POLAR-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Privacy-Utility Trade-offs in LLM Agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM agents increasingly have access to private user data and act on the user's behalf when interacting with third-party systems. The user defines what may and must not be shared, and the agent must robustly follow that intent even when third-party systems behave adversarially. We introduce POLAR-Bench (Policy-aware adversarial Benchmark), in which a trusted model with a privacy policy and a task converses with a third-party model that adversarially probes for both task-relevant and protected attributes. Across 10 domains and 7,852 samples, we score privacy and utility by deterministic set-membership and vary privacy policy dimension and attack strategy along two orthogonal axes, producing a 5 times 5 diagnostic surface per model. Our results reveal a sharp split: current frontier models withhold over 99% of protected attributes, while smaller open-weight models in the 1--30B range, the class users most commonly run as their own trusted agent on-device or via private inference, score notably worse, with the weakest leaking over half. POLAR-Bench thus localizes where each model's intent-following breaks down, providing a foothold for privacy alignment where it matters most.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2026.
Builds on
27 of 86 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026CI-Work: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Enterprise LLM Agents23 Apr
- 2025Privacy in Action: Towards Realistic Privacy Mitigation and Evaluation for LLM-Powered Agents22 Sep
- 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning11 Aug
- 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents12 Mar
- 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May
Other references · 22
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 832
10 more
- 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
- 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
- 2024PAPILLON: Privacy Preservation from Internet-based and Local Language Model Ensemblescited by 57
- 2024Is My Data in Your Retrieval Database? Membership Inference Attacks Against Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 44
- 2024LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Modelscited by 41
- 2023PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 37
- 2026Prompt Injection as Role Confusioncited by 17
- 2025Towards Benchmarking Privacy Vulnerabilities in Selective Forgetting with Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024Privacy Evaluation Benchmarks for NLP Modelscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026SovereignNegotiation-Bench: Evaluating User-Owned Personal Agents In Delegated Bargaining Under Privacy, Consent, Evidence, And Institutional Pressurecited by 1
- 2026Selection-Invariant Communication Compilers for Privacy-Aware Multi-Agent LLM Workflowscited by 1
- 2026MNC: Scope-Bound Semantic Declassification for Private LLM-Agent Communicationcited by 0
- 2026CoSec: Benchmarking Agent Security in Communitiescited by 0
- 2026CoSec: Benchmarking Agent Security in Communities28 Sep 2026
- 2026Selection-Invariant Communication Compilers for Privacy-Aware Multi-Agent LLM Workflows4 Aug 2026
- 2026MNC: Scope-Bound Semantic Declassification for Private LLM-Agent Communication3 Aug 2026
- 2026SovereignNegotiation-Bench: Evaluating User-Owned Personal Agents In Delegated Bargaining Under Privacy, Consent, Evidence, And Institutional Pressure2 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
- 2026OCELOT: Inference-Leakage Budgets for Privacy-Preserving LLM Agents
- 2025MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
- 2026AgentSecBench: Measuring Prompt Injection, Privacy Leakage, and Tool-Use Integrity in LLM Agents
- 2026Minim: Privacy-Aware Minimal View for Agents via Trusted Local Sanitization
- 2026Contextualized Privacy Defense for LLM Agents
- 2026CIPL: A Channel-Aware Framework for Recoverable Privacy Leakage in LLM Agents
- 2025Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents