mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PiSAs: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Multi-User Agentic Systems

arXiv 2607.05318 ↗First posted 6 Jul 2026cs.MA cs.CRcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

As LLM agents evolve from single-user assistants into shared organizational infrastructure, new privacy risks emerge: inappropriate information may not only be exposed through outputs for external recipients, but also internally across users through inter-agent messages, shared memory and agents. These data spillage risks are not captured by existing privacy benchmarks grounded in contextual integrity (CI) as they focus primarily on either single-user settings or interactions between independently owned agents. We introducePiSAs (Privacy in Shared Agentic systems), a benchmark for assessing unintentional leaks with dual CI annotations: whether an information is appropriate for the task, and which users may legitimately access it. This enables direct measurement of cross-user spillage across agentic system components and interfaces, such as outputs, inter-agent communication, and memory. PiSAsis system-agnostic and supports evaluation across different agent topologies and memory regimes. We find that, although system design improves CI compliance, results are bottlenecked by incorrect LLM judgment calls: even state-of-the-art models fail to reliably filter inappropriate content or restrict transmission to authorized users. Our findings underscore the need for privacy-preserving strategies, beyond those studied in this work.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026CalBench: Evaluating Coordination-Privacy Trade-offs in Multi-Agent LLMs10 May
  2. 2026CI-Work: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity in Enterprise LLM Agents23 Apr
  3. 2026AgentSocialBench: Evaluating Privacy Risks in Human-Centered Agentic Social Networks1 Apr
  4. 2026AgentLeak: A Benchmark for Internal-Channel Privacy Leakage in Multi-Agent LLM Systems12 Feb
  5. 2025MAGPIE: A benchmark for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation16 Oct
  6. 20251-2-3 Check: Enhancing Contextual Privacy in LLM via Multi-Agent Reasoning11 Aug
  7. 2025AgentDAM: Privacy Leakage Evaluation for Autonomous Web Agents12 Mar
  8. 2024AirGapAgent: Protecting Privacy-Conscious Conversational Agents8 May

Other references · 10

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,998
  3. 2023Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 230
  4. 2024PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Actioncited by 171
  5. 2024GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theorycited by 37
  6. 2024CI-Bench: Benchmarking Contextual Integrity of AI Assistants on Synthetic Datacited by 37
  7. 2025PrivaCI-Bench: Evaluating Privacy with Contextual Integrity and Legal Compliancecited by 37
  8. 2025CIMemories: A Compositional Benchmark for Contextual Integrity of Persistent Memory in LLMscited by 26
  9. 2026PersistBench: When Should Long-Term Memories Be Forgotten by LLMs?cited by 21
  10. 2025PPMI: Privacy-Preserving LLM Interaction with Socratic Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Homomorphically Encrypted Vector Databasescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentCIScope: Grounded Contextual Integrity Evaluation for LLM Agents
  2. 2026AgentSCOPE: Evaluating Contextual Privacy Across Agentic Workflows
  3. 2026MPCI-Bench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Pairwise Contextual Integrity Evaluation of Language Model Agents
  4. 2025MAGPIE: A dataset for Multi-AGent contextual PrIvacy Evaluation
  5. 2026Capable but Careless: Do Computer-Use Agents Follow Contextual Integrity?
  6. 2026Loose Lips: Understanding Privacy Leakage in Agentic Dialogue
  7. 2024Operationalizing Contextual Integrity in Privacy-Conscious Assistants
  8. 2026It Takes Two: Complementary Self-Distillation for Contextual Integrity in LLMs