mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Agent Computer Use

arXiv 2606.01533 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.MA cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → GUI and mobile agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer use agents (CUAs) today are primarily deployed as single serial agents. This setup is suboptimal for complex long-horizon tasks that benefit from task decomposition, parallel execution, and consistent re-planning based on new information. In this paper, we argue that we should instead move towards evaluating and building multi-agent computer use (MACU) systems. These systems, which emphasize planning and parallel execution, alleviate many of the shortcomings of single-agent CUAs. We propose a general multi-agent setup in which a manager model decomposes computer use tasks as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), encoding relevant dependencies and goals for subagents. At each iteration, the manager dispatches parallel CUA subagents to carry out nodes on the ready frontier of the DAG, and continuously revises the DAG (adding, canceling, or rewriting nodes) as new findings arrive from subagents. This design treats the partially observable environment of computer use as a first class challenge: information that downstream agents may not be able to re-observe are retained and passed forward through the manager and DAG structure. We demonstrate that MACU consistently improves over strong single-agent baselines by 3.4-25.5% on desktop (OSWorld) and web navigation (Online-Mind2Web, WebTailBench, Odysseys) benchmarks, exhibits more favorable test-time scaling, and solves complex long-horizon tasks where single-agent CUAs get stuck. On Odysseys, a long-horizon web navigation benchmark, MACU improves average task completion wall-clock time by ~ 1.5 ×, demonstrating its efficacy in speeding up traditionally slow CUA pipelines. Our findings highlight that multi-agent coordination is a promising axis for scaling computer use agents to work productively for longer and more effectively. We release all code and interactive visualizations at https://jykoh.com/multi-agent-computer-use.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in GUI and mobile agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 37 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

37 of 47 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Gym-Anything: Turn any Software into an Agent Environment7 Apr
  2. 2025Agent S2: A Compositional Generalist-Specialist Framework for Computer Use Agents1 Apr
  3. 2024Windows Agent Arena: Evaluating Multi-Modal OS Agents at Scale12 Sep
  4. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments11 Apr

Other references · 33

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 1,908
  4. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  5. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
  6. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  7. 2024WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 424
  8. 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 353
  9. 2024Agent Workflow Memorycited by 342
  10. 2024Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 235
  11. 2024WebLINX: Real-World Website Navigation with Multi-Turn Dialoguecited by 177
  12. 2025An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agentscited by 165
21 more
  1. 2024Tree Search for Language Model Agentscited by 148
  2. 2026Qwen3.5-Omni Technical Reportcited by 146
  3. 2025Inducing Programmatic Skills for Agentic Taskscited by 103
  4. 2025Recursive Language Modelscited by 94
  5. 2024Language Agents as Optimizable Graphscited by 81
  6. 2024MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Trainingcited by 71
  7. 2025In-the-Flow Agentic System Optimization for Effective Planning and Tool Usecited by 67
  8. 2025The Majority is not always right: RL training for solution aggregationcited by 46
  9. 2025AgentOrchestra: Orchestrating Multi-Agent Intelligence with the Tool-Environment-Agent(TEA) Protocolcited by 36
  10. 2025Fara-7B: An Efficient Agentic Model for Computer Usecited by 34
  11. 2025Learning to Reason Across Parallel Samples for LLM Reasoningcited by 32
  12. 2025Learning to Orchestrate Agents in Natural Language with the Conductorcited by 22
  13. 2025Rethinking Thinking Tokens: LLMs as Improvement Operatorscited by 20
  14. 2026Odysseys: Benchmarking Web Agents on Realistic Long Horizon Taskscited by 19
  15. 2026MolmoWeb: Open Visual Web Agent and Open Data for the Open Webcited by 17
  16. 2026Effective Strategies for Asynchronous Software Engineering Agentscited by 12
  17. 2026Why Do LLM-based Web Agents Fail? A Hierarchical Planning Perspectivecited by 9
  18. 2025InfantAgent-Next: A Multimodal Generalist Agent for Automated Computer Interactioncited by 7
  19. 2025TRINITY: An Evolved LLM Coordinatorcited by 5
  20. 2026InfoSeeker: A Scalable Hierarchical Parallel Agent Framework for Web Information Seekingcited by 5
  21. 2026Recursive Agent Optimizationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025OpenCUA: Open Foundations for Computer-Use Agents
  2. 2026Step-level Optimization for Efficient Computer-use Agents
  3. 2026CUA-Skill: Develop Skills for Computer Using Agent
  4. 2026cua-speedrun: Standardized Benchmarking of the Speed of Computer-Use Agents
  5. 2026MacAgentBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Real-World macOS Desktop
  6. 2026Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling in Local Computer-Use Agents: Failure Modes and Compute Tradeoffs
  7. 2026TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents
  8. 2026Agent Memory: Characterization and System Implications of Stateful Long-Horizon Workloads