TRINITY: An Evolved LLM Coordinator
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Combining diverse foundation models is promising, but weight-merging is limited by mismatched architectures and closed APIs. Trinity addresses this with a lightweight coordinator that orchestrates collaboration among large language models (LLMs). The coordinator, comprising a compact language model (approximately 0.6B parameters) and a lightweight head (approximately 10K parameters), is optimized with an evolutionary strategy for efficient and adaptive delegation. Trinity processes queries over multiple turns, where at each turn the coordinator assigns one of three roles (Thinker, Worker, or Verifier) to a selected LLM, effectively offloading complex skill acquisition from the coordinator itself. Experiments show that Trinity consistently outperforms individual models and existing methods across coding, math, reasoning, and domain knowledge tasks, and generalizes robustly to out-of-distribution tasks. On standard benchmarks, Trinity achieves state-of-the-art results, including a score of 86.2% on LiveCodeBench. Theoretical and empirical analyses identify two main factors behind this performance: (1) the coordinator's hidden-state representations provide rich contextualization of inputs, and (2) under high dimensionality and strict budget constraints, the separable Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy offers advantages over reinforcement learning, imitation learning, and random search by exploiting potential block-epsilon-separability.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.
Builds on
28 of 35 references.
References · 28
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,011
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
16 more
- 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
- 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 438
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
- 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 254
- 2024MT-Bench-101: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Multi-Turn Dialoguescited by 250
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 209
- 2024Evolutionary Optimization of Model Merging Recipescited by 208
- 2024Arcee's MergeKit: A Toolkit for Merging Large Language Modelscited by 194
- 2024RouterDC: Query-Based Router by Dual Contrastive Learning for Assembling Large Language Modelscited by 88
- 2025MasRouter: Learning to Route LLMs for Multi-Agent Systemscited by 88
- 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifierscited by 85
- 2024Learning to Route Among Specialized Experts for Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 65
- 2024Smoothie: Label Free Language Model Routingcited by 31
- 2025Transformer-Squared: Self-adaptive LLMscited by 16
- 2024Agent Skill Acquisition for Large Language Models via CycleQDcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Scaling Discovery through Test-Time Communicationcited by 7
- 2026Sakana Fugu Technical Reportcited by 4
- 2026Multi-Agent Computer Usecited by 3
- 2026Thinking Before Thinking: Scaling Agentic Inference Through Meta-Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026GVS5H: Zero-Shot Self-Orchestration with Ledger-Based Control for Improved LLM Coding Performancecited by 0
- 2026Thinking Before Thinking: Scaling Agentic Inference Through Meta-Reasoning29 Sep 2026
- 2026Scaling Discovery through Test-Time Communication17 Sep 2026
- 2026GVS5H: Zero-Shot Self-Orchestration with Ledger-Based Control for Improved LLM Coding Performance27 Aug 2026
- 2026Sakana Fugu Technical Report19 Jun 2026
- 2026Multi-Agent Computer Use1 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Efficient LLM Collaboration via Planning
- 2024Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent
- 2024LLM Augmented LLMs: Expanding Capabilities through Composition
- 2026Token-Level LLM Collaboration via FusionRoute
- 2024Designing Algorithms Empowered by Language Models: An Analytical Framework, Case Studies, and Insights
- 2025Language Modeling by Language Models
- 2024Coalitions of Large Language Models Increase the Robustness of AI Agents
- 2025Position: Scaling LLM Agents Requires Asymptotic Analysis with LLM Primitives