mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-Revising Discovery Systems for Science: A Categorical Framework for Agentic Artificial Intelligence

arXiv 2606.01444 ↗First posted 31 May 2026cs.AI cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.CLcited by 4

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific discovery is not only answer generation but revision of the representational regime in which evidence, artifacts, operations, and verifiers are typed. We develop a category-theoretic account of agentic discovery for materials science. In a fixed regime b with schema category Sb, the system state is a copresheaf It: Sb -> Set, and provenance is the category of elements intSb It. Fixed-regime operation is an update on such states, endofunctorial only when provenance-preserving refinements are specified and preserved. Discovery is instead a verified regime transition u: Sb -> Sb': old artifacts are preserved, transported by the left Kan extension Lanu It, and compared with the post-transition state to identify residual content beyond functorial transport. This separates retrieval, search, and discovery without subjective novelty. We instantiate the framework in two systems. In Builder/Breaker, a protein-mechanics world model is revised under a Minimum Description Length gate; the accepted law expresses within-chain flexibility as all-mode elastic compliance conditioned by slow collective-mode participation, or mode-conditioned compliance. In CategoryScienceClaw, typed skills, artifacts, open needs, workflow mutation, gates, stress tests, and public discourse become a proof-carrying knowledge-computation graph. A fiber-network example records candidate models, rejected alternatives, an AIC gate, perturbation tests, and an accepted orientation-tensor anisotropic stiffness surrogate over an isotropic fiber-count descriptor. Together, the cases show how category theory can be both a mathematical language for discovery and an engineering specification for self-revising AI discovery systems.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 19 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 81 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026GraphAgents: Knowledge Graph-Guided Agentic AI for Cross-Domain Materials Design7 Feb
  2. 2024ProtAgents: Protein discovery via large language model multi-agent collaborations combining physics and machine learning27 Jan

Other references · 17

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  3. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 422
  4. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
  5. 2019Paired Open-Ended Trailblazer (POET): Endlessly Generating Increasingly Complex and Diverse Learning Environments and Their Solutionscited by 192
  6. 2023MechAgents: Large language model multi-agent collaborations can solve mechanics problems, generate new data, and integrate knowledgecited by 63
  7. 2017Backprop as Functor: A compositional perspective on supervised learningcited by 44
  8. 2023MechGPT, a language-based strategy for mechanics and materials modeling that connects knowledge across scales, disciplines and modalitiescited by 38
  9. 2025AutoDiscovery: Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian Surprisecited by 33
  10. 2024Position: Categorical Deep Learning is an Algebraic Theory of All Architecturescited by 32
  11. 2023MeLM, a generative pretrained language modeling framework that solves forward and inverse mechanics problemscited by 29
  12. 2024PRefLexOR: Preference-based Recursive Language Modeling for Exploratory Optimization of Reasoning and Agentic Thinkingcited by 17
5 more
  1. 2025Sparks: Multi-Agent Artificial Intelligence Model Discovers Protein Design Principlescited by 17
  2. 2026Autonomous Agents Coordinating Distributed Discovery Through Emergent Artifact Exchangecited by 11
  3. 2021Learners' Languagescited by 6
  4. 2024Deep Learning with Parametric Lensescited by 3
  5. 2024Towards a Categorical Foundation of Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science
  2. 2025From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery
  3. 2026MADE: Benchmark Environments for Closed-Loop Materials Discovery
  4. 2025Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions
  5. 2025Toward Greater Autonomy in Materials Discovery Agents: Unifying Planning, Physics, and Scientists
  6. 2024SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning
  7. 2026Learning the ARTS of Search for Automated Discovery
  8. 2025PriM: Principle-Inspired Material Discovery through Multi-Agent Collaboration