SwarmWorld: Stigmergic technological evolution in societies of language-model agents
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Collective intelligence can emerge when individuals coordinate through a shared environment, allowing local actions to accumulate into durable social organization. Language-model agents offer a new substrate for this process, yet most multi-agent systems rely on direct conversation, predefined roles, or centralized workflows. It remains unclear whether decentralized agents can build functional technologies and outperform independent search. Here, initially homogeneous LLM agents in SwarmWorld self-organize without assigned roles or recipes into evolving technological societies. Agents explore a spatial environment, process resources, test materials, construct persistent artifacts, and write executable controllers evaluated by a deterministic simulator under unseen disturbances after the agents are removed. SwarmWorld splits cognition from consequence: agents propose architectures and controllers within fixed action and material schemas, while the simulated world determines function. Shared societies develop broader, more resilient technological portfolios than a strong best-of-N isolated-search baseline, although isolated search remains competitive for the strongest artifact. Agents differentiate into exploration, construction, maintenance, and coordination behaviors, transitioning as the world matures. Technologies accumulate through collaborative construction, executable inheritance, and persistent agent-artifact networks, with most reuse beginning through physical observation rather than communication. Explicit cultural mechanisms amplify collaboration and organization, but functional benefits depend on outcome and timescale. Physical stigmergy alone supports capable societies, while interaction drives persistent technological ecologies rather than universally superior individual inventions.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 14 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2026.
Builds on
14 of 64 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 13
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2025AgentSociety: Large-Scale Simulation of LLM-Driven Generative Agents Advances Understanding of Human Behaviors and Societycited by 186
- 2024DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agentscited by 100
- 2024Project Sid: Many-agent simulations toward AI civilizationcited by 49
- 2025Sparks: Multi-Agent Artificial Intelligence Model Discovers Protein Design Principlescited by 17
- 2024LLM2Swarm: Robot Swarms that Responsively Reason, Plan, and Collaborate through LLMscited by 12
- 2026Autonomous Agents Coordinating Distributed Discovery Through Emergent Artifact Exchangecited by 11
- 2025Benchmarking LLMs' Swarm intelligencecited by 10
- 2025LLM Agent Swarm for Hypothesis-Driven Drug Discoverycited by 8
- 2026TerraLingua: Emergence and Analysis of Open-endedness in LLM Ecologiescited by 4
- 2026Self-Revising Discovery Systems for Science: A Categorical Framework for Agentic Artificial Intelligencecited by 4
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Fresh Memory, Stale Plans: Dependency-Scoped Validation for Distributed LLM-Agent Memorycited by 0
- 2026Counter-Swarm Doctrine: Containing Coordinated Agent Intrusionscited by 0
- 2026We Built a Mirror and Mistook It for a Mind: Causal Liability and the Fallacy of AI Consciousnesscited by 0
- 2026LEGIT: Credentialing Protocol for Trustworthy AI Agent Marketplacescited by 0
- 2026LEGIT: Credentialing Protocol for Trustworthy AI Agent Marketplaces18 Sep 2026
- 2026We Built a Mirror and Mistook It for a Mind: Causal Liability and the Fallacy of AI Consciousness6 Sep 2026
- 2026Counter-Swarm Doctrine: Containing Coordinated Agent Intrusions5 Sep 2026
- 2026Fresh Memory, Stale Plans: Dependency-Scoped Validation for Distributed LLM-Agent Memory3 Sep 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Co-Evolution in Agentic Systems: Toward Self-Directed Evolution Beyond Human Design
- 2026Emergent Culture in Minimal LLM Systems
- 2026Superminds Test: Actively Evaluating Collective Intelligence of Agent Society via Probing Agents
- 2026When Agents Evolve, Institutions Follow
- 2026SAGE: A Quantitative Evaluation of Socialized Evolution in Agent Ecosystems
- 2025A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
- 2026From Language Models to World-Acting Systems: Progress and Limits of Agentic AI across Digital, Social, Virtual, and Physical Environments
- 2025The Collaboration Gap: Exploration and Benchmarking of Open-World Agentic Cooperation