Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Medical and scientific domain agents
Abstract (arXiv)
The convergence of artificial intelligence and materials science presents a transformative opportunity, but achieving true acceleration in discovery requires moving beyond task-isolated, fine-tuned models toward agentic systems that plan, act, and learn across the full discovery loop. This survey advances a unique pipeline-centric view that spans from corpus curation and pretraining, through domain adaptation and instruction tuning, to goal-conditioned agents interfacing with simulation and experimental platforms. Unlike prior reviews, we treat the entire process as an end-to-end system to be optimized for tangible discovery outcomes rather than proxy benchmarks. This perspective allows us to trace how upstream design choices-such as data curation and training objectives-can be aligned with downstream experimental success through effective credit assignment. To bridge communities and establish a shared frame of reference, we first present an integrated lens that aligns terminology, evaluation, and workflow stages across AI and materials science. We then analyze the field through two focused lenses: From the AI perspective, the survey details LLM strengths in pattern recognition, predictive analytics, and natural language processing for literature mining, materials characterization, and property prediction; from the materials science perspective, it highlights applications in materials design, process optimization, and the acceleration of computational workflows via integration with external tools (e.g., DFT, robotic labs). Finally, we contrast passive, reactive approaches with agentic design, cataloging current contributions while motivating systems that pursue long-horizon goals with autonomy, memory, and tool use. This survey charts a practical roadmap towards autonomous, safety-aware LLM agents aimed at discovering novel and useful materials.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 91 of its 432 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2026.
Builds on
91 of 432 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026M^4olGen: Multi-Agent, Multi-Stage Molecular Generation under Precise Multi-Property Constraints15 Jan
- 2025Automated Extraction of Material Properties using LLM-based AI Agents23 Sep
- 2025Hypothesis Generation for Materials Discovery and Design Using Goal-Driven and Constraint-Guided LLM Agents23 Jan
Other references · 88
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,616
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,337
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
38 more
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,424
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
- 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,341
- 2023Kosmos-2: Grounding Multimodal Large Language Models to the Worldcited by 1,075
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,002
- 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,000
- 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 752
- 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
- 2023Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionalitycited by 496
- 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
- 2021Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generationcited by 268
- 2025Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AIcited by 254
- 2025MemAgent: Reshaping Long-Context LLM with Multi-Conv RL-based Memory Agentcited by 235
- 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 178
- 2025Cosmos-Reason1: From Physical Common Sense To Embodied Reasoningcited by 159
- 2023Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language modelscited by 127
- 2025Agentic Large Language Models, a surveycited by 105
- 2024Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Modelscited by 104
- 2023MatterGen: a generative model for inorganic materials designcited by 98
- 2024SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoningcited by 90
- 2025Poisoning Attacks on LLMs Require a Near-constant Number of Poison Samplescited by 66
- 2024Many Heads Are Better Than One: Improved Scientific Idea Generation by A LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemcited by 63
- 2025Overtrained Language Models Are Harder to Fine-Tunecited by 57
- 2023From Molecules to Materials: Pre-training Large Generalizable Models for Atomic Property Predictioncited by 39
- 2025Less is More: Recursive Reasoning with Tiny Networkscited by 38
- 2024LLaMP: Large Language Model Made Powerful for High-fidelity Materials Knowledge Retrieval and Distillationcited by 32
- 2025Energy-Based Transformers are Scalable Learners and Thinkerscited by 30
- 2023LLM-Prop: Predicting Physical And Electronic Properties Of Crystalline Solids From Their Text Descriptionscited by 29
- 2024Multimodal Large Language Models for Inverse Molecular Design with Retrosynthetic Planningcited by 29
- 2022Faithfulness in Natural Language Generation: A Systematic Survey of Analysis, Evaluation and Optimization Methodscited by 27
- 2014Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 25
- 2025Wyckoff Transformer: Generation of Symmetric Crystalscited by 24
- 2022Deep Reinforcement Learning for Inverse Inorganic Materials Designcited by 18
- 2025MatterChat: A Multi-Modal LLM for Material Sciencecited by 18
50 most cited of 88 All 88 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025A Survey of AI for Materials Science: Foundation Models, LLM Agents, Datasets, and Tools
- 2025Large language models in materials science and the need for open-source approaches
- 2025PriM: Principle-Inspired Material Discovery through Multi-Agent Collaboration
- 2025Toward Greater Autonomy in Materials Discovery Agents: Unifying Planning, Physics, and Scientists
- 2026CompMat-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Computational Materials Science
- 2023Agent-based Learning of Materials Datasets from Scientific Literature
- 2025Hierarchical Multi-agent Large Language Model Reasoning for Autonomous Functional Materials Discovery
- 2024HoneyComb: A Flexible LLM-Based Agent System for Materials Science