MADE: Benchmark Environments for Closed-Loop Materials Discovery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing benchmarks for computational materials discovery primarily evaluate static predictive tasks or isolated computational sub-tasks. While valuable, these evaluations neglect the inherently iterative and adaptive nature of scientific discovery. We introduce MAterials Discovery Environments (MADE), a novel framework for benchmarking end-to-end autonomous materials discovery pipelines. MADE simulates closed-loop discovery campaigns in which an agent or algorithm proposes, evaluates, and refines candidate materials under a constrained oracle budget, capturing the sequential and resource-limited nature of real discovery workflows. We formalize discovery as a search for thermodynamically stable compounds relative to a given convex hull, and evaluate efficacy and efficiency via comparison to baseline algorithms. The framework is flexible; users can compose discovery agents from interchangeable components such as generative models, filters, and planners, enabling the study of arbitrary workflows ranging from fixed pipelines to fully agentic systems with tool use and adaptive decision making. We demonstrate this by conducting systematic experiments across a family of systems, enabling ablation of components in discovery pipelines, and comparison of how methods scale with system complexity.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.
Builds on
29 of 65 references.
References · 29
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,376
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,502
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,274
- 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,041
- 2025AlphaEvolve: A coding agent for scientific and algorithmic discoverycited by 819
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 814
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2021Crystal Diffusion Variational Autoencoder for Periodic Material Generationcited by 270
- 2024Large Language Models to Enhance Bayesian Optimizationcited by 129
- 2023Modern Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 123
- 2025MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agentscited by 118
- 2024Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Modelscited by 50
17 more
- 2024LLMatDesign: Autonomous Materials Discovery with Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2025Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discoverycited by 40
- 2024EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For In-Context Explorationcited by 34
- 2025CASCADE: Cumulative Agentic Skill Creation through Autonomous Development and Evolutioncited by 33
- 2025DREAMS: Density Functional Theory Based Research Engine for Agentic Materials Simulationcited by 29
- 2025Open Materials Generation with Stochastic Interpolantscited by 28
- 2025LeMat-GenBench: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Crystal Generative Modelscited by 23
- 2024LLM4Mat-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Materials Property Predictioncited by 21
- 2025Guiding Generative Models to Uncover Diverse and Novel Crystals via Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2025System of Agentic AI for the Discovery of Metal-Organic Frameworkscited by 16
- 2025MatSciBench: Benchmarking the Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models in Materials Sciencecited by 15
- 2025LLEMA: Evolutionary Search with LLMs for Multi-Objective Materials Discoverycited by 12
- 2025MOFGPT: Generative Design of Metal-Organic Frameworks using Language Modelscited by 11
- 2022Benchmarking Active Learning Strategies for Materials Optimization and Discoverycited by 10
- 2023Graph Neural Network Interatomic Potential Ensembles with Calibrated Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty on Energy and Forcescited by 10
- 2025BLIPs: Bayesian Learned Interatomic Potentialscited by 6
- 2025Benchmarking Self-Driving Labscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-Worldcited by 2
- 2026Surrogate-Gated Generation and Foundation-Model Embeddings for Bayesian Materials Designcited by 0
- 2026ChemWorld: Programmable Chemical Worlds for Controlled and Replayable Agent Experimentationcited by 0
- 2026Molecular LLM Agents: From Architectural Design to Scientific Autonomycited by 0
- 2026Online Surrogate Repair: Decoupling High-Fidelity Feedback from Search Length in Closed-Loop Discoverycited by 0
- 2026ALF: An Active Learning Framework for Scientific Discoverycited by 0
- 2026ALF: An Active Learning Framework for Scientific Discovery25 Sep 2026
- 2026Online Surrogate Repair: Decoupling High-Fidelity Feedback from Search Length in Closed-Loop Discovery7 Sep 2026
- 2026Accelerating Scientific Research with Gemini in the Real-World27 Aug 2026
- 2026Molecular LLM Agents: From Architectural Design to Scientific Autonomy24 Aug 2026
- 2026ChemWorld: Programmable Chemical Worlds for Controlled and Replayable Agent Experimentation11 Aug 2026
- 2026Surrogate-Gated Generation and Foundation-Model Embeddings for Bayesian Materials Design26 Jun 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Toward Greater Autonomy in Materials Discovery Agents: Unifying Planning, Physics, and Scientists
- 2026Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Science
- 2025Hierarchical Multi-agent Large Language Model Reasoning for Autonomous Functional Materials Discovery
- 2026CompMat-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents for Computational Materials Science
- 2025PriM: Principle-Inspired Material Discovery through Multi-Agent Collaboration
- 2025Aligning Reasoning LLMs for Materials Discovery with Physics-aware Rejection Sampling
- 2025Autonomous Inorganic Materials Discovery via Multi-Agent Physics-Aware Scientific Reasoning
- 2026Chemical filters for ultra-high-throughput materials screening and generation