Focal Reward: Balanced Reinforcement Learning under Rubric-Based Rewards
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The open-ended generation in LLMs usually requires multi-dimensional rubrics to adequately assess quality and guide the improvement of reinforcement learning. However, a critical dilemma inherent in this training paradigm is the imbalanced reward polarization along different rubric dimensions. Under this bottleneck, even if LLMs achieve relatively high rewards after training, they may still exhibit severe deficiencies in certain dimensions, leading to a direct deterioration in user experience. To address this problem, we propose Focal Reward, a novel objective to automatically balance the training of reinforcement learning under rubric-based rewards. Specifically, we first leverage an inverse reward projection mechanism to estimate the saturation degree of each criterion in the rubric, which forms the basis to calibrate the reward direction. Then, the final objective is designed with an automatically reweighting coefficient for each criterion to achieve the fine-grained balancing. Extensive experiments across three model scales and six benchmarks demonstrate that our Focal Reward method outperforms the strongest static aggregation baseline in all 18 model-benchmark comparisons. Rollout, mechanism, and ablation analyses further show that these gains arise from online, saturation-aware reallocation toward rubrics that still have room for improvement.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 51 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.
Builds on
51 of 53 references.
References · 51
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 651
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2023Prometheus: Inducing Fine-grained Evaluation Capability in Language Modelscited by 558
38 more
- 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 484
- 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
- 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 385
- 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 369
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 351
- 2025Rubrics as Rewards: Reinforcement Learning Beyond Verifiable Domainscited by 328
- 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 311
- 2024Judging the Judges: A Systematic Study of Position Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 249
- 2024Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustmentcited by 171
- 2025Crossing the Reward Bridge: Expanding RL with Verifiable Rewards Across Diverse Domainscited by 150
- 2024Large Language Models are Inconsistent and Biased Evaluatorscited by 146
- 2023Beyond One-Preference-Fits-All Alignment: Multi-Objective Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 121
- 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 118
- 2025Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Modelscited by 115
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchorscited by 108
- 2025WritingBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Generative Writingcited by 95
- 2024OffsetBias: Leveraging Debiased Data for Tuning Evaluatorscited by 94
- 2023EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 75
- 2023CritiqueLLM: Towards an Informative Critique Generation Model for Evaluation of Large Language Model Generationcited by 65
- 2026Rethinking Rubric Generation for Improving LLM Judge and Reward Modeling for Open-ended Taskscited by 55
- 2025Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewardscited by 47
- 2025AdvancedIF: Rubric-Based Benchmarking and Reinforcement Learning for Advancing LLM Instruction Followingcited by 46
- 2026Alternating Reinforcement Learning for Rubric-Based Reward Modeling in Non-Verifiable LLM Post-Trainingcited by 45
- 2024Are LLM-based Evaluators Confusing NLG Quality Criteria?cited by 35
- 2025Auto-Rubric: Learning From Implicit Weights to Explicit Rubrics for Reward Modelingcited by 29
- 2026Open Rubric System: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with Pairwise Adaptive Rubriccited by 26
- 2025Learning to Optimize Multi-Objective Alignment Through Dynamic Reward Weightingcited by 23
- 2024CARMO: Dynamic Criteria Generation for Context-Aware Reward Modellingcited by 21
- 2024Multi-Objective Alignment of Large Language Models Through Hypervolume Maximizationcited by 20
- 2025Pareto Multi-Objective Alignment for Language Modelscited by 20
- 2026ArenaRL: Scaling RL for Open-Ended Agents via Tournament-based Relative Rankingcited by 17
- 2024The Max-Min Formulation of Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning: From Theory to a Model-Free Algorithmcited by 13
- 2025RLAC: Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Critic for Free-Form Generation Taskscited by 12
- 2025InfiMed-ORBIT: Aligning LLMs on Open-Ended Complex Tasks via Rubric-Based Incremental Trainingcited by 11
- 2026Reward-free Alignment for Conflicting Objectivescited by 10
- 2026SibylSense: Adaptive Rubric Learning via Memory Tuning and Adversarial Probingcited by 6
- 2025Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewardscited by 5
- 2026APEX: Learning Adaptive Priorities for Multi-Objective Alignment in Vision-Language Generationcited by 2
50 most cited of 51 All 51 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scalecited by 6
- 2026Learn What's Left, Not What's Mastered: Saturation Aware Advantage Reweighting for Multi-Reward Policy Optimizationcited by 2
- 2026RLVR2: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rubric-based Rankingcited by 0
- 2026RLVR2: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rubric-based Ranking20 Sep 2026
- 2026Learn What's Left, Not What's Mastered: Saturation Aware Advantage Reweighting for Multi-Reward Policy Optimization17 Aug 2026
- 2026Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale13 Jun 2026