mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RLAC: Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Critic for Free-Form Generation Tasks

arXiv 2511.01758 ↗First posted 3 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 13

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL training of language and agent models

Abstract (arXiv)

Open-ended generation tasks require outputs to satisfy diverse and often implicit task-specific evaluation rubrics. The sheer number of relevant rubrics leads to prohibitively high verification costs and incomplete assessments of a response, making reinforcement learning (RL) post-training with rubric-based rewards difficult to scale. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that often the best way to combine these rubrics into one single reward is also highly prompt-specific. We propose Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Critic (RLAC), a post-training approach that addresses these challenges via dynamic rubric verification. Our approach employs a large language model (LLM) as a critic that dynamically identifies only the most likely failure modes (e.g., a factual error or unhandled edge case), which are then verified by an external validator to optimize both generator and critic jointly. By training both the generator and the critic, this game enhances the critic's error detection and the generator's output quality while reducing required verifications. Our experiments demonstrate that RLAC improves factual accuracy in text generation and correctness in code generation, while also outperforming exhaustive verification and reward model methods. We show that dynamic critics are more effective than fixed critics, showcasing the potential of RLAC for scaling RL post-training to free-form generation tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL training of language and agent models, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 47 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Nov 2025.

Builds on

47 of 59 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025ACECODER: Acing Coder RL via Automated Test-Case Synthesis3 Feb

Other references · 46

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  6. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  8. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  9. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  10. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  11. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  12. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
34 more
  1. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  2. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  3. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  4. 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,282
  5. 2022Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimizationcited by 1,095
  6. 2023BeaverTails: Towards Improved Safety Alignment of LLM via a Human-Preference Datasetcited by 860
  7. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
  8. 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 623
  9. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
  10. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 504
  11. 2024Generative Verifiers: Reward Modeling as Next-Token Predictioncited by 480
  12. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 406
  13. 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agentscited by 392
  14. 2024Interpretable Preferences via Multi-Objective Reward Modeling and Mixture-of-Expertscited by 376
  15. 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 367
  16. 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gymcited by 336
  17. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
  18. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
  19. 2024RLHF Workflow: From Reward Modeling to Online RLHFcited by 267
  20. 2023ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systemscited by 265
  21. 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 221
  22. 2023Helping or Herding? Reward Model Ensembles Mitigate but do not Eliminate Reward Hackingcited by 200
  23. 2024Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learningcited by 158
  24. 2023HelpSteer: Multi-attribute Helpfulness Dataset for SteerLMcited by 142
  25. 2023BooookScore: A systematic exploration of book-length summarization in the era of LLMscited by 137
  26. 2024Autonomous Evaluation and Refinement of Digital Agentscited by 137
  27. 2025Learning to Plan & Reason for Evaluation with Thinking-LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 78
  28. 2019Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without Referencescited by 77
  29. 2024Commit0: Library Generation from Scratchcited by 52
  30. 2023FaithScore: Fine-grained Evaluations of Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 46
  31. 2025When To Solve, When To Verify: Compute-Optimal Problem Solving and Generative Verification for LLM Reasoningcited by 42
  32. 2019Towards Coherent and Engaging Spoken Dialog Response Generation Using Automatic Conversation Evaluatorscited by 35
  33. 2024Self-rationalization improves LLM as a fine-grained judgecited by 27
  34. 2024Improving Model Factuality with Fine-grained Critique-based Evaluatorcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 12.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026EvoRubric: Self-Evolving Rubric-Driven RL for Open-Ended Generation
  2. 2026EvoRubrics: Dynamic Rubrics as Rewards via Adversarial Co-Evolution for LLM Reinforcement Learning
  3. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Rubric Anchors
  4. 2026RubricArmor: Adversarial Evolution Improves LLM-Based Rubric Generation
  5. 2026EvolveCoder: Evolving Test Cases via Adversarial Verification for Code Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Right in the Right Way: LM Training with Verifiable Rewards and Human Demonstrations
  7. 2026DARL: Encouraging Diverse Answers for General Reasoning without Verifiers
  8. 2025RL Tango: Reinforcing Generator and Verifier Together for Language Reasoning