mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Claw-Anything: Benchmarking Always-On Personal Assistants with Broader Access to User's Digital World

arXiv 2605.26086 ↗First posted 25 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → GUI and mobile agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model agents are increasingly envisioned as always-on personal assistants with access to anything relevant in the user's digital world. Yet current systems operate over only narrow slices of that world, limiting context-sensitive reasoning and effective assistance. Existing benchmarks similarly provide only partial user state and therefore fail to capture performance in such a broad, always-on setting. To address this gap, we introduce Claw-Anything, a benchmark that expands agent context along three dimensions: long-horizon activity histories, interdependent backend services, and integrated GUI and CLI interaction across multiple devices. To instantiate this setting, we simulate months of user activity through multi-round event injection, producing complex world states and realistic noise, including irrelevant events and conflicting signals. Agents must reason over rich contextual environments while remaining robust to such noise. This expanded scope also enables the evaluation of proactive assistance, requiring agents to anticipate user needs and deliver timely recommendations. Experiments show that GPT-5.5 achieves only 34.5% pass@1, substantially below prior benchmarks, underscoring a gap between current agent capabilities and the demands of always-on personal assistance. Alongside the benchmark, we release an automated data-generation pipeline that yields 2,000 training environments and improves the base model by 23.7%, demonstrating its utility of scalable data infrastructure.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in GUI and mobile agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.

Builds on

13 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Gym-Anything: Turn any Software into an Agent Environment7 Apr

Other references · 12

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
  3. 2024Training Software Engineering Agents and Verifiers with SWE-Gymcited by 300
  4. 2025SWE-smith: Scaling Data for Software Engineering Agentscited by 255
  5. 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agentscited by 57
  6. 2025ContextAgent: Context-Aware Proactive LLM Agents with Open-World Sensory Perceptionscited by 44
  7. 2026FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature Developmentcited by 30
  8. 2026ClawBench: Can AI Agents Complete Everyday Online Tasks?cited by 28
  9. 2026TermiGen: High-Fidelity Environment and Robust Trajectory Synthesis for Terminal Agentscited by 24
  10. 2026CLI-Gym: Scalable CLI Task Generation via Agentic Environment Inversioncited by 20
  11. 2026ProAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents for Proactive Assistance with Real-World Datacited by 15
  12. 2026SWE Context Bench: A Benchmark for Context Learning in Codingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026π-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows
  2. 2026STAGE-Claw: Automated State-based Agent Benchmarking for Realistic Scenarios
  3. 2026VitaBench 2.0: Evaluating Personalized and Proactive Agents in Long-Term User Interactions
  4. 2026MyPCBench: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Computer-Use Agents
  5. 2024SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluation
  6. 2026KnowU-Bench: Towards Interactive, Proactive, and Personalized Mobile Agent Evaluation
  7. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
  8. 2026Proactive Agent Research Environment: Simulating Active Users to Evaluate Proactive Assistants