STAGE-Claw: Automated State-based Agent Benchmarking for Realistic Scenarios
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are increasingly used to power personal agents for everyday applications, but evaluating these agents remains a challenge. Existing benchmarks still rely on sandboxed artifacts, static task design, and coarse scoring, which hinder scalability and limit progress toward reliable personal-agent evaluation. This paper introduces STAGE-Claw, an automated framework for building and evaluating realistic personal-agent scenarios in state-based personal-computing environments. Given a task hint, STAGE-Claw automatically creates and validates a realistic benchmark task with its environment, task prompts, ground truth, and related verification programs. Agents are then evaluated in realistic operating environments, where performance is measured by the correctness of the final system state rather than only the textual response. Using STAGE-Claw, this paper creates a benchmark with 40 challenging real scenario agent tasks, evaluates 11 frontier models, and analyzes their task scores, costs, tool-call reliability, and common failure patterns. Overall, STAGE-Claw offers a scalable, state-based way to evaluate agents in realistic user scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.
Builds on
13 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ClawsBench: Evaluating Capability and Safety of LLM Productivity Agents in Simulated Workspaces6 Apr
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains17 Jun
- 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents24 Jan
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey14 Sep
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents22 Aug
Other references · 8
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,242
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
- 2024AppWorld: A Controllable World of Apps and People for Benchmarking Interactive Coding Agentscited by 401
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ClawGym: A Scalable Framework for Building Effective Claw Agents
- 2026Claw-Anything: Benchmarking Always-On Personal Assistants with Broader Access to User's Digital World
- 2024SPA-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for SmartPhone Agent Evaluation
- 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agents
- 2026PDEU-Bench: Benchmarking the Personalized Planning Lifecycle of Tool-Calling LLM Agents
- 2026Toward User-Conditioned Evaluation of Personal LLM Agents under Temporal Interventions
- 2026AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts
- 2026MyPCBench: A Benchmark for Personally Intelligent Computer-Use Agents