Insuring Every Action: An Authority Frontier Framework for Runtime Actuarial Control of Autonomous AI Agents
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous AI agents increasingly issue side-effect-bearing actions: database mutations, refunds, payments, external commitments. We propose the Actuarial Action Interface (AAI), a deterministic runtime contract that prices each such action against a contractually fixed safe default under a time-consistent risk mapping, and gates execution against a per-boundary reserve capital budget. We then develop the Authority Frontier, an evaluation primitive measuring how much autonomous authority the runtime releases at each level of reserve capital. The framework provides (i) a deterministic quote-bind-commit protocol with toll-bounded capability tokens; (ii) a universal seven-class action taxonomy mapping heterogeneous tool calls to comparable authority units; (iii) replay determinism and pathwise reserve coverage under alpha-spending; (iv) cross-domain normalization via full reserve demand C_full and capital metrics Capital@k. We instantiate AAI across four agentic environments (database mutation, customer-service refund, and the public tau-bench retail and airline tool-use traces) and report a live Postgres panel in which three Azure-hosted models propose actions through the same contract. The frontier exhibits a common low-reserve refusal and intermediate-release pattern across domains, with saturation only where the budget grid reaches full reserve demand; required reserve capital varies by 22x (Capital@50 from 289 to 6457). The framework does not force domains into the same shape; it surfaces each domain's actuarial geometry. In the live panel the contract prevents realized loss across all three models at low budget while differing in underwriting persistence under denial: model identity is an actuarial underwriting variable. The contribution is a benchmark-ready evaluation framework for runtime actuarial control of autonomous-agent side effects.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2026.
Builds on
13 of 38 references.
References · 13
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
- 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
- 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 360
- 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
- 2014Optimizing the CVaR via Samplingcited by 98
- 2014Algorithms for CVaR Optimization in MDPscited by 98
- 2026Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agentscited by 8
- 2021Algorithmic Insurancecited by 5
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Foundations of a Time-Consistent Counterfactual Actuarial Runtime for Autonomous AI Agentscited by 2
- 2026Gaming-Resistant Insurance Contracts for Autonomous AI Agents: Strategy-Proof Toll Mechanism Designcited by 0
- 2026SteerBench-Work: A Benchmark for Agent Steering at Action Boundariescited by 0
- 2026The Irreversibility Budget: Fleet-Level Risk Accounting and Admission Control for Agent Operating Systemscited by 0
- 2026The Irreversibility Budget: Fleet-Level Risk Accounting and Admission Control for Agent Operating Systems31 Aug 2026
- 2026SteerBench-Work: A Benchmark for Agent Steering at Action Boundaries12 Aug 2026
- 2026Gaming-Resistant Insurance Contracts for Autonomous AI Agents: Strategy-Proof Toll Mechanism Design15 Jun 2026
- 2026Foundations of a Time-Consistent Counterfactual Actuarial Runtime for Autonomous AI Agents26 May 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Behavioral Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: The AgentBound Framework
- 2026Runtime Governance for AI Agents: Policies on Paths
- 2026Runtime Governance for Agentic AI: Action-Boundary Control with Trusted Provenance and Fail-Closed Execution
- 2026Authority-Inference Separation in Agentic Finance: First-Line Control, Blockchain Enforcement, and Replayable Assurance
- 2026CAVA: Canonical Action Verification and Attestation for Runtime Governance of Agentic AI Systems
- 2026PACE: Policy-Attested Contract Execution for Safe AI Agents in Decentralized Finance
- 2026A pragmatic approach to regulating AI agents
- 2026A Five-Plane Reference Architecture for Runtime Governance of Production AI Agents