Agentic Agile-V: From Vibe Coding to Verified Engineering in Software and Hardware Development
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Agentic AI coding systems can inspect repositories, plan implementation steps, edit files, call tools, run tests, and submit pull requests. These capabilities make software and hardware development faster in some settings, but current evidence does not support the simple claim that autonomous code generation automatically improves engineering outcomes. Controlled studies report productivity gains in some enterprise tasks, slowdowns in mature open-source work, moderate but heterogeneous meta-analytic effects, and persistent failures in repository setup, dependency handling, permission gating, and hardware verification. This paper argues that the central problem is no longer prompt engineering; it is engineering process control. It synthesizes evidence from agentic software engineering, GitHub-scale adoption studies, repository-level agent configuration, productivity trials, issue-resolution benchmarks, and hardware/RTL verification research. It proposes Agentic Agile-V, a process framework that uses Agile-V as the lifecycle backbone and a task-level SCOPE-V loop - Specify, Constrain, Orchestrate, Prove, Evolve, and Verify - to convert conversational intent into structured engineering artifacts and acceptance evidence. The paper contributes: (i) a taxonomy of minimum input artifacts for agentic software, firmware, and hardware work; (ii) a conversation-to-contract gate that separates exploratory dialogue from implementation; (iii) risk-adaptive feature, bug-fix, testing, and hardware workflows; and (iv) an evidence-bundle acceptance model for agent-generated artifacts. The paper concludes that agentic AI does not eliminate engineering discipline; it increases the value of requirements, constraints, traceability, independent verification, and human approval.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 27 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
27 of 46 references.
Closest ancestors · 15
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Instruction Adherence in Coding Agent Configuration Files: A Factorial Study of Four File-Structure Variables11 May
- 2026Rethinking Software Engineering for Agentic AI Systems12 Apr
- 2026SWE-Skills-Bench: Do Agent Skills Actually Help in Real-World Software Engineering?16 Mar
- 2026SWE-rebench V2: Language-Agnostic SWE Task Collection at Scale27 Feb
- 2026Harness Engineering for Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Study16 Feb
- 2026Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?12 Feb
- 2026AIDev: Studying AI Coding Agents on GitHub9 Feb
- 2026Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance9 Feb
- 2026On the Impact of AGENTS.md Files on the Efficiency of AI Coding Agents28 Jan
- 2025Agentic Software Issue Resolution with Large Language Models: A Survey24 Dec
- 2025The OpenHands Software Agent SDK: A Composable and Extensible Foundation for Production Agents5 Nov
- 2025On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub18 Sep
3 more
Other references · 12
- 2025Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivitycited by 101
- 2025A Survey of Research in Large Language Models for Electronic Design Automationcited by 41
- 2024A Survey: Collaborative Hardware and Software Design in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2024How much does AI impact development speed? An enterprise-based randomized controlled trialcited by 20
- 2025RepoMaster: Autonomous Exploration and Understanding of GitHub Repositories for Complex Task Solvingcited by 19
- 2025RealBench: Benchmarking Verilog Generation Models with Real-World IP Designscited by 14
- 2026Advances and Frontiers of LLM-based Issue Resolution in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 10
- 2026Measuring the Permission Gate: A Stress-Test Evaluation of Claude Code's Auto Modecited by 10
- 2025FIXME: Towards End-to-End Benchmarking of LLM-Aided Design Verificationcited by 9
- 2025Revolution or Hype? Seeking the Limits of Large Models in Hardware Designcited by 9
- 2026Agile V: A Compliance-Ready Framework for AI-Augmented Engineering -- From Concept to Audit-Ready Deliverycited by 1
- 2026A meta-analysis of the effect of generative AI on productivity and learning in programmingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
- 2026Human-AI Collaboration and the Transformation of Software Engineering Work
- 2026Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle: Architecture, Empirical Evidence, and the Reshaping of Software Engineering
- 2025Agentic Refactoring: An Empirical Study of AI Coding Agents
- 2026Assistance to Autonomy: A Systematic Literature Review of Agentic AI across the Software Development Life Cycle
- 2026How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests
- 2026From Determinism to Delegation: AI-Native Software Engineering and the Evolution of the Agentic Engineer
- 2026SDAD: Spec-Driven Agentic Development for the AI-Native SDLC