mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Impact of AGENTS.md Files on the Efficiency of AI Coding Agents

arXiv 2601.20404 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.ETcited by 16

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

AI coding agents such as Codex and Claude Code are increasingly used to autonomously contribute to software repositories. However, little is known about how repository-level configuration artifacts affect operational efficiency of the agents. In this paper, we study the impact of AGENTS.md files on the runtime and token consumption of AI coding agents operating on GitHub pull requests. We analyze 10 repositories and 124 pull requests, executing agents under two conditions: with and without an AGENTS.md file. We measure wall-clock execution time and token usage during agent execution. Our results show that the presence of AGENTS.md is associated with a lower median runtime (Delta 28.64%) and reduced output token consumption (Delta 16.58%), while maintaining a comparable task completion behavior. Based on these results, we discuss immediate implications for the configuration and deployment of AI coding agents in practice, and outline a broader research agenda on the role of repository-level instructions in shaping the behavior, efficiency, and integration of AI coding agents in software development workflows.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2026.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026EET: Experience-Driven Early Termination for Cost-Efficient Software Engineering Agents9 Jan
  2. 2025Agentic AI for Software: thoughts from Software Engineering community24 Aug

Other references · 3

  1. 2024A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 646
  2. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applicationscited by 428
  3. 2019Assessing the Quality of the Steps to Reproduce in Bug Reportscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 16.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026Harness Engineering for Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Studycited by 10
  2. 2026Codified Context: Infrastructure for AI Agents in a Complex Codebasecited by 5
  3. 2026Do Context Files Help Coding Agents? A Two-Agent Ablation Study on Real Repositoriescited by 4
  4. 2026Knowledge Activation: AI Skills as the Institutional Knowledge Primitive for Agentic Software Developmentcited by 3
  5. 2026Agentic Agile-V: From Vibe Coding to Verified Engineering in Software and Hardware Developmentcited by 2
  6. 2026Context Rot in AI-Assisted Software Development: Repurposing Documentation Consistency for AI Configuration Artifactscited by 2
  7. 2026FAVA: Formal Authorization for Verified Agents with Evidence-Backed Permission Graphscited by 2
  8. 2026Why Does CLAUDE.md Keep Growing? Catastrophic Remembering in Agentic Codingcited by 2
  9. 2026The Devil Is in the Interface: Evaluating How Tool Architecture Shapes Coding Agent Behaviorcited by 2
  10. 2026From Registry to Repository: How AI Agent Skills Are Written, Adapted, and Maintainedcited by 1
  11. 2026An Exploratory Study of Agent Plans for Agentic AI Coding Tools in Open-Source Softwarecited by 1
  12. 2026The Impact of Configuring Agentic AI Coding Tools on Build-vs-Buy Decisions: A Study Protocolcited by 0
4 more
  1. 2026Probe-and-Refine Tuning of Repository Guidance for Coding Agentscited by 0
  2. 2026Specifying and Maintaining Agentic Workflows: An Empirical Study of GitHub Agentic Workflowscited by 0
  3. 2026ParallelPilot: Supporting Coordination and Monitoring in Parallel AI Codingcited by 0
  4. 2026Scientific Agents: Evaluating Profession-Specific System Prompts on Scientific Taskscited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Investigating Autonomous Agent Contributions in the Wild: Activity Patterns and Code Change over Time
  2. 2026Govern the Repository, Not the Agent: Measuring Ecosystem-Level Risk in AI-Native Software
  3. 2025On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
  4. 2026Toward Instructions-as-Code: Understanding the Impact of Instruction Files on Agentic Pull Requests
  5. 2026Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
  6. 2026How AI Coding Agents Modify Code: A Large-Scale Study of GitHub Pull Requests
  7. 2026AI IDEs or Autonomous Agents? Measuring the Impact of Coding Agents on Software Development
  8. 2026How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests