SDAD: Spec-Driven Agentic Development for the AI-Native SDLC
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Frontier coding agents backed by large language models with context windows from hundreds of thousands to millions of tokens are restructuring the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Rich context handling and multi-step reasoning now allow substantial Functional Requirement Documents (FRDs) and repository context to be ingested in a single workflow, making specification quality the execution fuel for autonomous delivery. This report formalises Spec-Driven Agentic Development (SDAD) as a synthesis of disciplined up-front formalisation and high-velocity implementation: intent capture, machine-readable specification, agentic synthesis, and independent multi-agent verification under human sign-off. We revisit the historical pendulum between Waterfall and Agile, introduce AI-code as a fourth production paradigm, and compare Human-Agile (circa 2020) with Agentic-SDAD (circa 2026) across artefacts, cadence, accountability, and security posture. Beyond process description, we extend the model to team role metamorphosis (engineer, QA, platform, and product functions), quantitative governance (Ambiguity Tax, Spec Fidelity, SER, and TCI_agentic with repair multiplier phi), and pragmatic adoption via hybrid estimation and a staged migration blueprint. Industrial and research evidence on AI-augmented testing and verification is integrated to motivate separation between synthesis and release authority. Overall, the paper argues that agentic speed does not eliminate engineering discipline; it relocates discipline upstream into specification precision, explicit gates, and auditable provenance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 26 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2026AgenticTyper: Automated Typing of Legacy Software Projects Using Agentic AI21 Feb
- 2025Speed at the Cost of Quality: How Cursor AI Increases Short-Term Velocity and Long-Term Complexity in Open-Source Projects6 Nov
Other references · 9
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2023Software Testing with Large Language Models: Survey, Landscape, and Visioncited by 163
- 2024On the Evaluation of Large Language Models in Unit Test Generationcited by 33
- 2024How much does AI impact development speed? An enterprise-based randomized controlled trialcited by 19
- 2024An Empirical Study on the Code Refactoring Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025Migrating Code At Scale With LLMs At Googlecited by 14
- 2024ChatCollab: Exploring Collaboration Between Humans and AI Agents in Software Teamscited by 6
- 2024Large Language Models for Automated Web-Form-Test Generation: An Empirical Studycited by 3
- 2026Tiered Super-Moore's Law: Price Evolution, Production Frontiers, and Market Competition in Large Language Model Inference Servicescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026The Spec Growth Engine: Spec-Anchored, Code-Coupled, Drift-Enforced Architecture for AI-Assisted Software Development
- 2026Rethinking Software Engineering for Agentic AI Systems
- 2026Spec Kit Agents: Context-Grounded Agentic Workflows
- 2026Spec-Driven Development for Agentic Software Engineering: Harnessing Human-Agent Teamwork
- 2026Beyond Human-Readable: Rethinking Software Engineering Conventions for the Agentic Development Era
- 2026Specifying AI-SDLC Processes: A Protocol Language for Human-Agent Boundaries
- 2026Agentic AI in the Software Development Lifecycle: Architecture, Empirical Evidence, and the Reshaping of Software Engineering
- 2026Agentic Agile-V: From Vibe Coding to Verified Engineering in Software and Hardware Development