Introspective X Training: Feedback Conditioning Improves Scaling Across all LLM Training Stages
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
We tackle the question of how to scale more efficiently across the many, ever-growing stages of current LLM training pipelines. Our guiding intuition stems from the fact that the dynamics of later stages of the pipeline, e.g. post-training, can be used to inform earlier stages such as pre-training. To this end, we propose Introspective Training (or IXT), inspired by offline reward-conditioned reinforcement learning and applicable to any stage of training. IXT uses a thinking reward model to annotate data with natural language critique based feedback, enabling quality aware training from the earliest stages of the pipeline. Models are then trained by prefix-conditioning the data with the generated feedback -- ensuring that not all tokens are treated equally starting much earlier in training than usual. Comprehensive experiments on 7.5-12B transformer-based dense LLMs trained from scratch all the way up to 18 Trillion tokens seen show that our method: bends scaling curves resulting in up to 2.8x more compute efficiency generally; and reaches performance levels unachievable for models trained otherwise in domains such as math and code.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 37 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
37 of 51 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 36
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,546
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
- 2023GQA: Training Generalized Multi-Query Transformer Models from Multi-Head Checkpointscited by 1,346
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
24 more
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 861
- 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 723
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 247
- 2022Quark: Controllable Text Generation with Reinforced Unlearningcited by 237
- 2021Primer: Searching for Efficient Transformers for Language Modelingcited by 164
- 2024Critique-out-Loud Reward Modelscited by 106
- 2025On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language Modelscited by 69
- 2025NVIDIA Nemotron 3: Efficient and Open Intelligencecited by 65
- 2024Does your data spark joy? Performance gains from domain upsampling at the end of trainingcited by 52
- 2024Improving Pretraining Data Using Perplexity Correlationscited by 46
- 2025Safety Pretraining: Toward the Next Generation of Safe AIcited by 43
- 2025Front-Loading Reasoning: The Synergy between Pretraining and Post-Training Datacited by 27
- 2025RLP: Reinforcement as a Pretraining Objectivecited by 25
- 2025Predictive Data Selection: The Data That Predicts Is the Data That Teachescited by 21
- 2025Meta-rater: A Multi-dimensional Data Selection Method for Pre-training Language Modelscited by 19
- 2025Language Models Improve When Pretraining Data Matches Target Taskscited by 19
- 2025Text2Grad: Reinforcement Learning from Natural Language Feedbackcited by 18
- 2025Language Models Can Learn from Verbal Feedback Without Scalar Rewardscited by 18
- 2026Shaping capabilities with token-level data filteringcited by 13
- 2026Pre-training LLM without Learning Rate Decay Enhances Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 13
- 2026Self-Improving Pretraining: using post-trained models to pretrain better modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Scaling Behaviors of LLM Reinforcement Learning Post-Training: An Empirical Study in Mathematical Reasoning
- 2026InfoSFT: Learn More and Forget Less with Information-Aware Token Weighting
- 2026Expanding the Capabilities of Reinforcement Learning via Text Feedback
- 2025Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
- 2026Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning
- 2026Grad2Reward: From Sparse Judgment to Dense Rewards for Improving Open-Ended LLM Reasoning
- 2025The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMs