mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SoFT: Soft Targets for Generalizable LLM Fine-Tuning

arXiv 2609.32493 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Knowledge distillation → Knowledge distillation for LLMs

Abstract (arXiv)

Distillation enables student language models to acquire new capabilities from expert teachers. However, integrating knowledge from multi-teacher, multi-domain demonstrations into a single student remains challenging. We study supervised fine-tuning (SFT) in this setting, where students must acquire diverse capabilities while maintaining generalization beyond the training tasks. Our experiments reveal varying trade-offs between in-distribution learning and out-of-distribution generalization across SFT methods, motivating more explicit control over this balance. To this end, we propose soft-target fine-tuning (SoFT) to balance learning from teacher demonstrations with retaining the Base model's existing capabilities. SoFT sets a minimum target probability for each demonstrated token while making the smallest KL change to the Base distribution. The resulting objective couples learning from demonstrations with adaptively weighted regularization toward the Base model. We further use domain-specific gradient budgets to control this balance and determine a probability threshold for each trajectory. Experiments on mixed-domain reasoning and agentic tasks show that SoFT achieves the best overall performance among the compared methods, with improvements in both in-distribution capability acquisition and out-of-distribution generalization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge distillation for LLMs, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 41 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

41 of 56 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Skill-Aware Data Selection and Fine-Tuning for Data-Efficient Reasoning Distillation15 Jan
  2. 2025OpenCodeReasoning: Advancing Data Distillation for Competitive Coding2 Apr
  3. 2022Distilling Reasoning Capabilities into Smaller Language Models1 Dec

Other references · 38

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  5. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  6. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  7. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  8. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  9. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,391
  10. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  11. 2025s1: Simple test-time scalingcited by 1,341
  12. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
26 more
  1. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
  2. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 801
  3. 2023Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizescited by 737
  4. 2025τ2-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environmentcited by 627
  5. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  6. 2026Kimi K2.5: Visual Agentic Intelligencecited by 501
  7. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 487
  8. 2022Large Language Models Are Reasoning Teacherscited by 329
  9. 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 304
  10. 2022Teaching Small Language Models to Reasoncited by 284
  11. 2018Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networkscited by 227
  12. 2024Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 162
  13. 2025Llama-Nemotron: Efficient Reasoning Modelscited by 158
  14. 2026Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligencecited by 138
  15. 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 133
  16. 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
  17. 2024Knowledge Fusion of Large Language Modelscited by 115
  18. 2026DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash: Pushing the Limits of KV Cache Compressioncited by 76
  19. 2026Qwen3-Coder-Next Technical Reportcited by 71
  20. 2021RiddleSense: Reasoning about Riddle Questions Featuring Linguistic Creativity and Commonsense Knowledgecited by 61
  21. 2026Tmax: A simple recipe for terminal agentscited by 33
  22. 2025Rethinking Fine-Tuning when Scaling Test-Time Compute: Limiting Confidence Improves Mathematical Reasoningcited by 29
  23. 2026Reasoning-Trace Collapse: Evaluating the Loss of Explicit Reasoning During Fine-Tuningcited by 4
  24. 2026PriFT: Prior-Support Guided Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 2
  25. 2026ProCUA-SFT Technical Reportcited by 2
  26. 2026Stabilizing LLM Supervised Fine-Tuning via Explicit Distributional Controlcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Application-Driven Pedagogical Knowledge Optimization of Open-Source LLMs via Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning
  2. 2025UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  3. 2026RAFT: Data Refinement and Adaptive Distillation for Domain Fine-Tuning with Alleviated Forgetting
  4. 2026Goal-Conditioned Supervised Learning for LLM Fine-Tuning
  5. 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models
  6. 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
  7. 2025Anchored Supervised Fine-Tuning
  8. 2026InfoSFT: Learn More and Forget Less with Information-Aware Token Weighting