mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Robust Policy Optimization to Prevent Catastrophic Forgetting

arXiv 2602.08813 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are commonly trained through multi-stage post-training: first via RLHF, then fine-tuned for other downstream objectives. Yet even small downstream updates can compromise earlier learned behaviors (e.g., safety), exposing a brittleness known as catastrophic forgetting. This suggests standard RLHF objectives do not guarantee robustness to future adaptation. To address it, most prior work designs downstream-time methods to preserve previously learned behaviors. We argue that preventing this requires pre-finetuning robustness: the base policy should avoid brittle high-reward solutions whose reward drops sharply under standard fine-tuning. We propose Fine-tuning Robust Policy Optimization (FRPO), a robust RLHF framework that optimizes reward not only at the current policy, but across a KL-bounded neighborhood of policies reachable by downstream adaptation. The key idea is to ensure reward stability under policy shifts via a max-min formulation. By modifying GRPO, we develop an algorithm with no extra computation, and empirically show it substantially reduces safety degradation across multiple base models and downstream fine-tuning regimes (SFT and RL) while preserving downstream task performance. We further study a math-focused RL setting, demonstrating that FRPO preserves accuracy under subsequent fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 94 of its 112 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

94 of 112 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025RewardBench 2: Advancing Reward Model Evaluation2 Jun
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  3. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback12 Apr
  4. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun

Other references · 90

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  6. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  7. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  8. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  9. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  10. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  11. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  12. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
38 more
  1. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
  2. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  3. 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
  4. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
  5. 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
  6. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
  7. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  8. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  9. 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,276
  10. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  11. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  12. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
  13. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
  14. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 938
  15. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 860
  16. 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
  17. 2022DualPrompt: Complementary Prompting for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 635
  18. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  19. 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
  20. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 450
  21. 2017Robust Adversarial Reinforcement Learningcited by 439
  22. 2021SWAD: Domain Generalization by Seeking Flat Minimacited by 431
  23. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedbackcited by 394
  24. 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
  25. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  26. 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 337
  27. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
  28. 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 333
  29. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 313
  30. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
  31. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
  32. 2021ASAM: Adaptive Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Scale-Invariant Learning of Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  33. 2023Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Modelscited by 284
  34. 2020On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong Baselinescited by 254
  35. 2020Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observationscited by 235
  36. 2018Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselinescited by 228
  37. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 222
  38. 2024WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Modelscited by 206

50 most cited of 90 All 90 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Taming the Implicit: Dual-Channel Risk-Aware Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Continual Multimodal Post-Training
  2. 2025Retaining by Doing: The Role of On-Policy Data in Mitigating Forgetting
  3. 2023Stabilizing RLHF through Advantage Model and Selective Rehearsal
  4. 2026TMS: Trajectory-Mixed Supervision for Reward-Free, On-Policy SFT
  5. 2025The Choice of Divergence: A Neglected Key to Mitigating Diversity Collapse in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Reward
  6. 2026Mechanistic Analysis of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuning
  7. 2026Unlocking the Critic: Reward-Free Policy Optimization for LLM Post-Training
  8. 2026Bridging SFT and RL: Dynamic Policy Optimization for Robust Reasoning