mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DGPO: Distribution Guided Policy Optimization for Fine Grained Credit Assignment

arXiv 2605.03327 ↗First posted 5 May 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning is crucial for aligning large language models to perform complex reasoning tasks. However, current algorithms such as Group Relative Policy Optimization suffer from coarse grained, sequence level credit assignment, which severely struggles to isolate pivotal reasoning steps within long Chain of Thought generations. Furthermore, the standard unbounded Kullback Leibler divergence penalty induces severe gradient instability and mode seeking conservatism, ultimately stifling the discovery of novel reasoning trajectories. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Distribution Guided Policy Optimization, a novel critic free reinforcement learning framework that reinterprets distribution deviation as a guiding signal rather than a rigid penalty. DGPO replaces the volatile KL divergence with the bounded Hellinger distance to safely quantify token level exploration without the risk of gradient explosion. To effectively distinguish genuine reasoning breakthroughs from hallucinatory noise, we propose an entropy gating mechanism that scales this deviation by the policy`s epistemic uncertainty. By dynamically redistributing the coarse sequence-level advantage to individual tokens based on these gated scores, DGPO heavily incentivizes critical exploratory steps while suppressing unwarranted, low-entropy deviations. Consequently, DGPO completely eliminates the traditional token-level KL penalty and achieves fine-grained credit reallocation without the computational overhead of an additional value network. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate that DGPO sets a new state-of-the-art for critic free alignment. Notably, on the Qwen2.5-32B architecture, DGPO achieves 60.0% Avg@32 accuracy and 46.0% Avg@32 accuracy on the challenging AIME2024 and AIME2025 benchmarks respectively, substantially outperforming competitive baselines like DAPO.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2026.

Builds on

31 of 38 references.

Closest ancestors · 15

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026FIPO: Eliciting Deep Reasoning with Future-KL Influenced Policy Optimization20 Mar
  2. 2026Demystifying Group Relative Policy Optimization: Its Policy Gradient is a U-Statistic1 Mar
  3. 2025ESPO: Entropy Importance Sampling Policy Optimization29 Nov
  4. 2025GroundedPRM: Tree-Guided and Fidelity-Aware Process Reward Modeling for Step-Level Reasoning16 Oct
  5. 2025Linking Process to Outcome: Conditional Reward Modeling for LLM Reasoning30 Sep
  6. 2025Dynamic and Generalizable Process Reward Modeling23 Jul
  7. 2025Group-in-Group Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training16 May
  8. 2025RM-R1: Reward Modeling as Reasoning5 May
  9. 2025R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward Modeling27 Mar
  10. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  11. 2025AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidence19 Feb
  12. 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
3 more
  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model29 May
  2. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedback25 Nov
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms20 Jul

Other references · 16

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  4. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  5. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  6. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
  7. 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 788
  8. 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimizationcited by 244
  9. 2023ReMax: A Simple, Effective, and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Method for Aligning Large Language Modelscited by 184
  10. 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraintscited by 174
  11. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 135
  12. 2022On Reinforcement Learning and Distribution Matching for Fine-Tuning Language Models with no Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 80
4 more
  1. 2025Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Trainingcited by 29
  2. 2025Pre-Trained Policy Discriminators are General Reward Modelscited by 14
  3. 2026HiMAC: Hierarchical Macro-Micro Learning for Long-Horizon LLM Agentscited by 7
  4. 2026Distribution-Centric Policy Optimization Dominates Exploration-Exploitation Trade-offcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ERPO: Token-Level Entropy-Regulated Policy Optimization for Large Reasoning Models
  2. 2026GeneralThinker: Domain-General Reasoning through Likelihood-Guided Answer-Conditioned Optimization
  3. 2026ACPO: Asymmetric Credit Policy Optimization via Mode-Local Entropy Surrogate
  4. 2026Hidden States Know Where Reasoning Diverges: Credit Assignment via Span-Level Wasserstein Distance
  5. 2026Surprising Success, Repeated Failure: Entropy-Guided Credit Assignment for Exploration in LLM Reasoning
  6. 2025CE-GPPO: Coordinating Entropy via Gradient-Preserving Clipping Policy Optimization in Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Semifactual Credit-Augmented Policy Optimization
  8. 2025GTPO and GRPO-S: Token and Sequence-Level Reward Shaping with Policy Entropy